Zimmer Holger, Ludwig Heidi, Bader Michael, Bailer Josef, Eickholz Peter, Staehle Hans Jörg, Triebig Gerhard
Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2002 Apr;205(3):205-11. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00146.
It has been argued that the release of mercury from amalgam fillings is of toxicological relevance. The aim of the study was to determine the internal mercury exposure of two groups differing in their attitude towards possible health hazards by mercury from amalgam fillings. It was to be examined if the two groups differ with regard to the mercury concentration in different biological matrices and to compare the results with current reference values. Blood, urine and saliva samples were analyzed from 40 female subjects who claimed to suffer from serious health damage due to amalgam fillings ("amalgam sensitive subjects"). 43 female control subjects did not claim any association ("amalgam non-sensitive controls"). Mercury was determined by means of cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry. Number and surfaces of amalgam fillings were determined by dentists for each subject. Median (range) mercury levels in blood were 2.35 (0.25-13.40) micrograms/l for "amalgam sensitive subjects" and 2.40 (0.25-10.50) micrograms/l for "amalgam non-sensitive controls". In urine, the median mercury concentrations were 1.55 (0.06-14.70) micrograms/l and 1.88 (0.20-8.43) micrograms/g creatinine respectively. No significant differences could be found between the two groups. Mercury levels in blood and urine of the examined subjects were within the range of background levels in the general population including persons with amalgam fillings. Stimulated saliva contained 76.4 (6.7-406.0) micrograms mercury/l in "amalgam sensitive subjects" and 57.0 (2.8-559.0) micrograms mercury/l in controls (not significant). Mercury levels in saliva did not correlate with the concentrations in blood and urine, but merely with the number of amalgam fillings or of the filling surfaces. Mercury in saliva is therefore not recommended for a biological monitoring.
有人认为,汞合金填充物释放的汞具有毒理学相关性。该研究的目的是确定两组对汞合金填充物可能的健康危害态度不同的人群的体内汞暴露情况。研究要考察这两组在不同生物基质中的汞浓度是否存在差异,并将结果与当前参考值进行比较。对40名自称因汞合金填充物而遭受严重健康损害的女性受试者(“汞合金敏感受试者”)的血液、尿液和唾液样本进行了分析。43名女性对照受试者未声称有任何关联(“汞合金非敏感对照”)。通过冷蒸气原子吸收光谱法测定汞含量。每位受试者的汞合金填充物数量和表面积由牙医确定。“汞合金敏感受试者”血液中的汞含量中位数(范围)为2.35(0.25 - 13.40)微克/升,“汞合金非敏感对照”为2.40(0.25 - 10.50)微克/升。尿液中的汞浓度中位数分别为1.55(0.06 - 14.70)微克/升和1.88(0.20 - 8.43)微克/克肌酐。两组之间未发现显著差异。被检查受试者血液和尿液中的汞含量在包括有汞合金填充物的人群在内的普通人群背景水平范围内。“汞合金敏感受试者”刺激唾液中的汞含量为76.4(6.7 - 406.0)微克/升,对照组为57.0(2.8 - 559.0)微克/升(无显著差异)。唾液中的汞含量与血液和尿液中的浓度无关,仅与汞合金填充物的数量或填充表面积有关。因此,不建议将唾液汞用于生物监测。