Gil J, Rodriguez-Irazoqui M, Söderquist L, Rodriguez-Martinez H
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala.
Theriogenology. 2002 Apr 15;57(7):1781-92. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)00652-0.
We compared the fertility of thawed ram semen, frozen according to different prefreezing semen handling protocols and previously well-defined in vitro, after cervical artificial insemination (AI) during natural estrus in Corriedale sheep. Following primary extension 1 + 1, we adjusted the final sperm concentration before packaging (200 x 10(6)/straw) either by centrifugation, in order to reconcentrate the extended semen (Protocol 1: P1), or without centrifugation, by adjusting the final sperm number by stepwise extension (Protocol 2: P2). We evaluated sperm motility (assessed both subjectively and with a computer-assisted sperm analysis instrument [CASA]), membrane integrity (SYBR-14/PI), and capacitation status (chlortetracycline [CTC]) in vitro in three pooled straws of frozen-thawed semen. Three hundred Corriedale ewes, having shown spontaneous estrus during the breeding season (i.e., April, in the southern hemisphere) under extensive management conditions in Uruguay, were cervically inseminated with thawed semen from the same freezing operations as studied in vitro. The semen evaluation in vitro yielded higher percentages (P < 0.05) of damaged spermatozoa in the samples where sperm numbers were adjusted by extension before freezing (P2), compared with when adjustment was done by centrifugation (P1). However, due to the higher sperm concentration finally achieved by P2, the calculated total number of viable spermatozoa was almost equal in the two AI doses. We observed no differences in fertility between P1 and P2 for either nonreturn rates (NRRs) 21 (30.8 vs. 29.7%) and 36 (28.5 vs. 27.8%) days after AI or lambing rate (21.9 vs. 21.4%), respectively. Fertility did not differ significantly between the two different procedures of adjusting sperm numbers prior to freezing. This may indicate that the simplified protocol with adjusted extension of the semen, resulting in higher numbers of viable spermatozoa, should be the procedure of choice when freezing ram semen under field conditions. Further studies aimed at improving the modified protocol need to be performed.
我们比较了在科里代尔羊自然发情期进行子宫颈人工授精(AI)后,根据不同的冻前精液处理方案冷冻并先前在体外已明确界定的解冻公羊精液的生育力。在初次稀释1 + 1之后,我们通过离心来调整包装前的最终精子浓度(200×10⁶/细管),以便重新浓缩稀释后的精液(方案1:P1),或者不进行离心,通过逐步稀释来调整最终精子数量(方案2:P2)。我们在三个合并的冻融精液细管中体外评估了精子活力(主观评估以及使用计算机辅助精子分析仪[CASA]评估)、膜完整性(SYBR - 14/PI)和获能状态(金霉素[CTC])。在乌拉圭粗放管理条件下,300只在繁殖季节(即南半球的4月)表现出自然发情的科里代尔母羊,用来自与体外研究相同冷冻操作的解冻精液进行子宫颈人工授精。体外精液评估显示,与通过离心调整精子数量(P1)相比,在冷冻前通过稀释调整精子数量的样本(P2)中,受损精子的百分比更高(P < 0.05)。然而,由于P2最终达到的精子浓度更高,在两种人工授精剂量中计算出的活精子总数几乎相等。在人工授精后21天(30.8%对29.7%)和36天(28.5%对27.8%)的返情率(NRR)或产羔率(21.9%对21.4%)方面,我们未观察到P1和P2在生育力上的差异。在冷冻前调整精子数量的两种不同程序之间,生育力没有显著差异。这可能表明,在野外条件下冷冻公羊精液时,采用简化的精液稀释调整方案,从而获得更多活精子数量,应是首选程序。需要进行进一步研究以改进改良方案。