Suppr超能文献

浓度和生化检测对妊娠高血压患者尿试纸准确性的影响。

Effect of concentration and biochemical assay on the accuracy of urine dipsticks in hypertensive pregnancies.

作者信息

Waugh J, Bell S C, Kilby M, Lambert P, Shennan A, Halligan A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Hypertens Pregnancy. 2001;20(2):205-17. doi: 10.1081/PRG-100106970.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess how urine concentration and biochemical assay influence the assessment of proteinuria.

METHODS

This was a prospective study to assess the accuracy of detection and quantification of proteinuria within the day assessment unit and antenatal ward of a teaching hospital in Leicester, United Kingdom. We studied hypertensive pregnancies (of mixed parity) referred to day care assessment or attending the antenatal hypertension clinic after 20 completed weeks of gestation (n = 197). Aliquots of a well-mixed 24-h urine collection were tested by routine dipstick urinalysis and then assayed for protein using the Benzethonium Chloride and the Bradford assays (n = 197).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Total protein excretion in 24 h and protein concentration per liter of urine for both biochemical assays were compared to semiquantitative dipstick protein measurement.

RESULTS

The prevalence of proteinuria in the study group varied according to the method used for testing. Dipstick urinalysis recorded the lowest prevalence (16.2%) and the Benzethonium Chloride assay measuring total protein excretion in 24 h recorded the highest (70.1%). When the positive and negative predictive values for dipstick urinalysis were calculated, performance was found to be dependent on both the units of measurement compared and the type of assay used as the "gold standard." Positive predictive values ranged from 87.5% to 96.9% and negative predictive values ranged from 35.2% to 92.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancies is dependent on the method used to detect it. The amount of protein assessed quantitatively is further dependent on the biochemical assay employed. However, regardless of the quantitative assessment, dipstick urinalysis has a significant false-negative rate. This first reporting of a variation in performance between dipstick urinalysis and two different biochemical assays in pregnancy may be explained in relation to protein assay specificity and the observed protein compositions of the samples on electrophoretic analysis. The significance of proteinuria should be considered in light of the method used to detect it, but, ultimately, it must be related to clinical outcome.

摘要

目的

评估尿液浓缩和生化检测如何影响蛋白尿的评估。

方法

这是一项前瞻性研究,旨在评估英国莱斯特一家教学医院日间评估单元和产前病房内蛋白尿检测和定量的准确性。我们研究了妊娠20周后转诊至日间护理评估或前往产前高血压门诊的高血压妊娠(不同孕周)患者(n = 197)。对充分混合的24小时尿液样本进行常规试条尿检,然后使用苯扎氯铵法和考马斯亮蓝法检测蛋白质(n = 197)。

主要观察指标

将两种生化检测方法测得的24小时总蛋白排泄量和每升尿液中的蛋白浓度与试条半定量蛋白测量结果进行比较。

结果

研究组中蛋白尿的患病率因检测方法而异。试条尿检记录的患病率最低(16.2%),而检测24小时总蛋白排泄量的苯扎氯铵法记录的患病率最高(70.1%)。计算试条尿检的阳性和阴性预测值时,发现其性能取决于所比较的测量单位和用作“金标准”的检测类型。阳性预测值范围为87.5%至96.9%,阴性预测值范围为35.2%至92.1%。

结论

高血压妊娠中蛋白尿的患病率取决于检测方法。定量评估的蛋白量进一步取决于所采用的生化检测方法。然而,无论定量评估如何,试条尿检都有显著的假阴性率。妊娠中试条尿检与两种不同生化检测方法之间性能差异的首次报道,可能与蛋白检测特异性以及电泳分析中样本观察到的蛋白组成有关。蛋白尿的意义应根据检测方法来考虑,但最终必须与临床结局相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验