• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩展监管概念的阈值:致癌物和诱变剂的微量豁免限度

Extending the threshold of regulation concept: de minimis limits for carcinogens and mutagens.

作者信息

Fiori Janice M, Meyerhoff Roger D

机构信息

Toxicology and Drug Disposition, Lilly Research Laboratories, Division of Eli Lilly and Company, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002 Apr;35(2 Pt 1):209-16. doi: 10.1006/rtph.2002.1534.

DOI:10.1006/rtph.2002.1534
PMID:12052005
Abstract

Risk assessment processes for carcinogens are highly developed but risk assessment processes for mutagens are not well established. In the pharmaceutical industry, risk associated with exposure to carcinogens is tightly controlled. It is desirable to control risk associated with exposure to mutagens also, in spite of the greater uncertainty associated with the risk. In this paper, a published cancer potency database is used to frame the risk and to support risk management decisions. A de minimis exposure for mutagens is proposed and a decision matrix is presented to align available data with risk assessment approaches for carcinogens and mutagens.

摘要

致癌物的风险评估流程已高度完善,但诱变剂的风险评估流程尚未完全确立。在制药行业,与接触致癌物相关的风险受到严格控制。尽管与诱变剂相关的风险存在更大的不确定性,但同样需要控制与接触诱变剂相关的风险。在本文中,一个已发表的癌症效力数据库被用于构建风险并支持风险管理决策。本文提出了诱变剂的最低暴露标准,并给出了一个决策矩阵,以使现有数据与致癌物和诱变剂的风险评估方法保持一致。

相似文献

1
Extending the threshold of regulation concept: de minimis limits for carcinogens and mutagens.扩展监管概念的阈值:致癌物和诱变剂的微量豁免限度
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002 Apr;35(2 Pt 1):209-16. doi: 10.1006/rtph.2002.1534.
2
Setting air quality standards for carcinogens: an alternative to mathematical quantitative risk assessment-discussion paper.设定致癌物的空气质量标准:数学定量风险评估的替代方案——讨论文件
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1997 Aug;26(1 Pt 2):S60-70. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1997.1140.
3
Risk assessment of peak exposure to genotoxic carcinogens: a pragmatic approach.遗传毒性致癌物峰值暴露的风险评估:一种实用方法。
Toxicol Lett. 2004 Jun 15;151(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.01.027.
4
Addressing nonlinearity in the exposure-response relationship for a genotoxic carcinogen: cancer potency estimates for ethylene oxide.解决遗传毒性致癌物暴露-反应关系中的非线性问题:环氧乙烷的癌症效力估计
Risk Anal. 2004 Oct;24(5):1165-83. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00517.x.
5
Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal.食品中遗传毒性致癌物的风险评估方法:批判性评价。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2006 Oct;44(10):1613-35. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Jul 14.
6
Background, approaches and recent trends for setting health-based occupational exposure limits: a minireview.基于健康的职业接触限值设定的背景、方法及近期趋势:一篇综述
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Aug;51(3):253-69. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
7
Principles of risk assessment for determining the safety of chemicals: recent assessment of residual solvents in drugs and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.用于确定化学品安全性的风险评估原则:药物中残留溶剂及邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯的近期评估
Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2004 Jun;44(2):51-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-4520.2004.00009.x.
8
Risk assessment of dietary exposures to compounds that are genotoxic and carcinogenic--an overview.饮食接触遗传毒性和致癌性化合物的风险评估——综述
Toxicol Lett. 2008 Aug 15;180(2):110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 May 23.
9
Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective.化学品的致癌性分类——从欧洲视角看需考虑的新方面
Toxicol Lett. 2004 Jun 15;151(1):29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.04.004.
10
Comparison of carcinogenic and in vivo genotoxic potency estimates.致癌性和体内遗传毒性效力估计值的比较。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005 Feb;96(2):131-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto960207.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Toxicological Framework for the Prioritization of Children's Safe Product Act Data.《儿童安全产品法案数据优先排序的毒理学框架》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Apr 19;13(4):431. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13040431.
2
Assessment of potential risk levels associated with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reference values.评估与美国环境保护局参考值相关的潜在风险水平。
Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Aug;111(10):1318-25. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6185.