Brattebø Guttorm, Hofoss Dag, Flaatten Hans, Muri Anne Kristine, Gjerde Stig, Plsek Paul E
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway.
BMJ. 2002 Jun 8;324(7350):1386-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7350.1386.
Need for improved sedation strategy for adults receiving ventilator support.
Observational study of effect of introduction of guidelines to improve the doctors' and nurses' performance. The project was a prospective improvement and was part of a national quality improvement collaborative.
A general mixed surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital; all doctors and nurses in the unit; all adult patients (>18 years) treated by intermittent positive pressure ventilation for more than 24 hours.
Reduction in patients' mean time on a ventilator and length of stay in intensive care over a period of 11 months; anonymous reporting of critical incidents; staff perceptions of ease and of consequences of changes.
Multiple measures (protocol development, educational presentations, written guidelines, posters, flyers, emails, personal discussions, and continuous feedback) were tested, rapidly assessed, and adopted if beneficial.
Mean ventilator time decreased by 2.1 days (95% confidence interval 0.7 to 3.6 days) from 7.4 days before intervention to 5.3 days after. Mean stay decreased by 1.0 day (-0.9 to 2.9 days) from 9.3 days to 8.3 days. No accidental extubations or other incidents were identified.
Relatively simple changes in sedation practice had significant effects on length of ventilator support. The change process was well received by the staff and increased their interest in identifying other areas for improvement.
需要为接受呼吸机支持的成年人改进镇静策略。
对引入指南以改善医生和护士表现的效果进行观察性研究。该项目是一项前瞻性改进项目,是全国质量改进合作项目的一部分。
一家大学医院的综合外科重症监护病房;该病房的所有医生和护士;所有接受间歇正压通气治疗超过24小时的成年患者(>18岁)。
在11个月的时间内,减少患者使用呼吸机的平均时间和重症监护病房的住院时间;对严重事件进行匿名报告;工作人员对改变的难易程度及后果的看法。
对多种措施(制定方案、进行教育讲座、编写指南、张贴海报、发放传单、发送电子邮件、进行个人讨论以及持续反馈)进行测试、快速评估,若有益则采用。
平均呼吸机使用时间从干预前的7.4天减少了2.1天(95%置信区间为0.7至3.6天),降至干预后的5.3天。平均住院时间从9.3天减少了1.0天(-0.9至2.9天),降至8.3天。未发现意外拔管或其他事件。
镇静实践中相对简单的改变对呼吸机支持时间有显著影响。变革过程受到工作人员的好评,并提高了他们对确定其他改进领域的兴趣。