de Araujo Berber Rodolfo Cassimiro, Madureira Ed Hoffman, Baruselli Pietro Sampaio
Department of Animal Reproduction, Medicine College of Veterinary, São Paulo University, Brazil.
Theriogenology. 2002 Mar 15;57(5):1421-30. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)00639-8.
We evaluated the efficiency of replacing GnRH with LH in the ovulation synchronization protocol in buffaloes. Buffaloes received GnRH on Day 0, (Buserelin; Conceptal, 20 microg), PGF2alpha (Luprostiol; Prosolvin, 15 mg) on Day 7 and GnRH (Buserelin; Conceptal, 10 microg; Group 1) or porcine LH (LH; Lutropin-V, 12.5 mg; Group 2) on Day 9. In Experiment 1, we studied the follicular dynamics of 30 buffaloes (Group 1, n = 15 and Group 2, n = 15). We performed ultrasonography every 12 h from Days 0 to 2, then on Day 7 and then every 6 h from the time of GnRH or LH treatment (Day 9) until the time of ovulation. All females not ovulating by 48 h after the second GnRH or LH injection were considered as nonresponders. In Experiment 2, we evaluated 305 buffaloes (Group 1, n = 154; Group 2, n = 151), using the same two treatments studied in Experiment 1. We also recorded and evaluated aspects like parity, lactational status, the presence of mucus, and uterine tone at the time of artificial insemination (Al). In Experiment 1, ovulation rate after the first GnRH was 86.6% (26/30). Ovulation rates were 93.3% (14/15; Group 1) after the second dose of GnRH and 93.3% (14/15) after LH (Group 2). Ovulation occurred 36.4+/-10.4 h after the first GnRH. The interval for treatment to ovulation was 26.5+/-9.6 h for buffaloes treated with GnRH (Group 1) and 24.4+/-7.9 h for buffaloes treated with LH (Group 2); the time of ovulation did not differ statistically between the two groups (GnRH versus LH; P > 0.05). In Experiment 2, conception rates of the animals AI in the field were 56.5% (Group 1) and 64.2% (Group 2), respectively (P = 0.08). The response to the treatment with LH was not different to the treatment with GnRH; however, multiparous buffaloes had higher conception rates than the primiparous buffaloes in both groups (P > 0.05). Buffaloes with mucus at the time of AI in Group 2 had higher conception rates than the buffaloes that had mucus in Group 1 (P < 0.05). Uterine tone and lactational status did not influence conception rates (P > 0.05). In summary, the results showed that both treatments resulted in synchronization of ovulation and acceptable conception rates. Therefore, the exogenous injection of LH can substitute the GnRH injections in the Ovsynch program in buffaloes.
我们评估了在水牛排卵同步方案中用促黄体生成素(LH)替代促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)的效果。水牛在第0天接受GnRH(布舍瑞林;Conceptal,20微克),在第7天接受前列腺素F2α(氯前列醇;Prosolvin,15毫克),并在第9天接受GnRH(布舍瑞林;Conceptal,10微克;第1组)或猪促黄体生成素(LH;促排素,12.5毫克;第2组)。在实验1中,我们研究了30头水牛的卵泡动态(第1组,n = 15;第2组,n = 15)。从第0天到第2天每12小时进行一次超声检查,然后在第7天进行检查,接着从GnRH或LH治疗时(第9天)到排卵时每6小时进行一次检查。在第二次注射GnRH或LH后48小时内未排卵的所有雌性被视为无反应者。在实验2中,我们评估了305头水牛(第1组,n = 154;第2组,n = 151),采用了与实验1中相同的两种处理方法。我们还记录并评估了诸如胎次、泌乳状态、人工授精(AI)时黏液的存在情况以及子宫张力等方面。在实验1中,第一次注射GnRH后的排卵率为86.6%(26/30)。第二次注射GnRH后的排卵率为93.3%(14/15;第1组),注射LH后的排卵率为93.3%(14/15;第2组)。第一次注射GnRH后36.4±10.4小时排卵。用GnRH治疗的水牛(第1组)从治疗到排卵的间隔时间为26.5±9.6小时,用LH治疗的水牛(第2组)为24.4±7.9小时;两组之间排卵时间在统计学上无差异(GnRH与LH相比;P>0.05)。在实验2中,现场进行人工授精的动物的受孕率分别为56.5%(第1组)和64.2%(第2组)(P = 0.08)。LH治疗的反应与GnRH治疗无差异;然而,两组中经产水牛的受孕率均高于初产水牛(P>0.05)。第2组人工授精时有黏液的水牛受孕率高于第1组有黏液的水牛(P<0.05)。子宫张力和泌乳状态不影响受孕率(P>0.05)。总之,结果表明两种处理均导致排卵同步且受孕率可接受。因此,在水牛的Ovsynch方案中外源性注射LH可替代GnRH注射。