Suppr超能文献

年轻的失聪及听力障碍学生的拼写模式。

Patterns of spelling in young deaf and hard of hearing students.

作者信息

Allman Tamby M

出版信息

Am Ann Deaf. 2002 Mar;147(1):46-64. doi: 10.1353/aad.2012.0152.

Abstract

The study examined the invented spelling abilities demonstrated by kindergarten and first-grade deaf and hard of hearing students. The study included two parts: In Part 1, the researcher compared three groups (deaf, hard of hearing, and hearing) using posttesting only on the Early Reading Screening Inventory, or ERSI (Morris, 1998), and in part 2 collected and analyzed samples of the spelling of deaf students in a Total Communication program. Analysis showed that the deaf group performed significantly differently in three areas: concept of word, word recognition, and phoneme awareness ("invented spelling"; Read, 1971). The deaf group outperformed the hearing and hard of hearing groups in concept of word and word recognition. But in phoneme awareness, the deaf group performed significantly less well than the hearing group. Therefore, the deaf group's spelling was followed for 1 year. Deaf students' spelling patterns were not the same as those of hearing and hard of hearing students. Deaf students' spelling miscues were directly related to the cueing systems of lipreading, signing, and fingerspelling.

摘要

该研究考察了幼儿园及一年级失聪和听力受损学生所表现出的自创拼写能力。该研究包括两个部分:在第一部分中,研究人员仅使用《早期阅读筛查量表》(ERSI,莫里斯,1998年)进行后测,比较了三组学生(失聪、听力受损和听力正常);在第二部分中,收集并分析了采用全交流教学法的失聪学生的拼写样本。分析表明,失聪组在三个方面表现出显著差异:单词概念、单词识别和音素意识(“自创拼写”;里德,1971年)。失聪组在单词概念和单词识别方面的表现优于听力正常组和听力受损组。但在音素意识方面,失聪组的表现明显不如听力正常组。因此,对失聪组学生的拼写情况进行了为期1年的跟踪。失聪学生的拼写模式与听力正常和听力受损学生不同。失聪学生的拼写错误与唇读、手语和手指拼写的提示系统直接相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验