Ricketts Thomas C
Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7590, USA.
J Rural Health. 2002;18 Suppl:140-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2002.tb00926.x.
Rural health research is a unique field. It is neither a nested subcategory under general health services research nor a separate field of policy analysis or advocacy. Rural health research faces three potential crises: of content, of applicability, and of credibility. The content of the field is driven often by funds, its applicability is thus limited by its purview as well as its special constituency, and its credibility is challenged by its findings, sometimes contrary to accepted positions in the larger health services field. Rural health research can strengthen its position by accepting the paradoxes it presents, especially the paradox of continuing disparity in the face of substantial investment to eliminate differences, and by seeking to answer why this occurs across the rural-urban spectrum. Rural health research can answer questions about why the distribution of resources is unfair without depending solely on pure definitions
农村卫生研究是一个独特的领域。它既不是一般卫生服务研究下的一个嵌套子类别,也不是政策分析或倡导的一个单独领域。农村卫生研究面临三个潜在危机:内容危机、适用性危机和可信度危机。该领域的内容往往由资金驱动,其适用性因此受到其范围以及特殊选民群体的限制,其可信度受到其研究结果的挑战,有时这些结果与更大的卫生服务领域中公认的立场相反。农村卫生研究可以通过接受它所呈现的悖论,特别是面对为消除差异而进行大量投资却持续存在差距的悖论,并寻求回答为什么这种情况在城乡范围内都会发生,来加强其地位。农村卫生研究可以回答关于资源分配为何不公平的问题,而不必仅仅依赖于纯粹的定义。