Smee Donald F, Bailey Kevin W, Sidwell Robert W
Department of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Sciences, Institute for Antiviral Research, Utah State University, 84322-5600, Logan, UT 84322-5600, USA.
Antiviral Res. 2002 May;54(2):113-20. doi: 10.1016/s0166-3542(01)00217-0.
The acyclic purine nucleoside analog, 2-amino-7-[(1,3-dihydroxy-2-propoxy)methyl]purine (S2242) and its orally active diacetate ester prodrug (HOE961) were reported to be potent inhibitors of vaccinia virus replication in cell culture and in infected mice. These compounds were evaluated further, using infections with the related cowpox virus. Against a wild-type (WT) cowpox virus strain in mouse C127I cell culture, 50% effective concentrations (EC(50), determined by plaque reduction assays) of S2242 and cidofovir (a positive control) were 3.5 and 1.0 microM, respectively. EC(50) values obtained against a cidofovir-resistant strain of the virus were 33 and 230 microM, respectively. Compounds were at least ten-fold less potent against WT virus in Vero cells than C127I cells. S2242 and cidofovir were 50% inhibitory to the proliferation of uninfected C127I cells at 340 and 180 microM, respectively, but neither compound inhibited Vero cell growth at 1000 microM. Mice were lethally infected with cowpox virus by intranasal inoculation, followed 24 h later by antiviral treatment for 5 consecutive days. Once or twice daily intraperitoneal (i.p.) treatments with either S2242 or HOE961 at 100 mg/kg per day resulted in > or = 70 survival compared with no survivors in the placebo group. Lower doses of these compounds (10 and 30 mg/kg per day) were not protective, however. Cidofovir was 100% protective at 30 mg/kg per day. A 10-day course of treatment gave comparable survival results and demonstrated the oral efficacy of HOE961. Treatments with S2242 (100 mg/kg per day) and cidofovir (30 mg/kg per day) each reduced lung and nasal virus titers by approximately ten-fold, whereas, HOE961 (100 mg/kg per day) was less active. Overall, S2242 and HOE961 were found to be effective against cowpox virus infections in mice but were less potent than cidofovir. Since, HOE961 was orally active, it may have advantages over the other parenterally administered compounds for treating orthopoxvirus infections.
无环嘌呤核苷类似物2-氨基-7-[(1,3-二羟基-2-丙氧基)甲基]嘌呤(S2242)及其口服活性二乙酸酯前药(HOE961)据报道是细胞培养物和感染小鼠中痘苗病毒复制的有效抑制剂。使用相关的牛痘病毒感染对这些化合物进行了进一步评估。在小鼠C127I细胞培养物中,针对野生型(WT)牛痘病毒株,S2242和西多福韦(阳性对照)的50%有效浓度(通过蚀斑减少试验测定的EC50)分别为3.5和1.0 microM。针对该病毒的西多福韦耐药株获得的EC50值分别为33和230 microM。在Vero细胞中,化合物对WT病毒的效力比对C127I细胞至少低十倍。S2242和西多福韦分别在340和180 microM时对未感染的C127I细胞增殖有50%抑制作用,但在1000 microM时两种化合物均未抑制Vero细胞生长。通过鼻内接种使小鼠感染致死剂量的牛痘病毒,24小时后连续5天进行抗病毒治疗。每天以100 mg/kg的剂量对S2242或HOE961进行一次或两次腹腔内(i.p.)治疗,与安慰剂组无存活者相比,存活率≥70%。然而,这些化合物的较低剂量(每天10和30 mg/kg)没有保护作用。西多福韦在每天30 mg/kg时具有100%的保护作用。为期10天的治疗疗程给出了类似的存活结果,并证明了HOE961的口服疗效。用S2242(每天100 mg/kg)和西多福韦(每天30 mg/kg)治疗均使肺和鼻病毒滴度降低了约十倍,而HOE961(每天100 mg/kg)活性较低。总体而言,发现S2242和HOE961对小鼠牛痘病毒感染有效,但效力低于西多福韦。由于HOE961具有口服活性,在治疗正痘病毒感染方面可能比其他胃肠外给药的化合物具有优势。