von Zerssen Detlev
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
J Affect Disord. 2002 Apr;68(2-3):143-58. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00045-9.
A unidimensional model of the relationships between normal temperament, psychopathic variants of it and the two main forms of so-called endogenous psychoses (major affective disorders and schizophrenia) was derived from Kretschmer's constitutional typology. It was, however, not confirmed by means of a biometric approach nor was Kretschmer's broad concept of cyclothymia as a correlate of physical stoutness on the one hand and major affective disorders on the other supported by empirical data. Yet the concept of the 'melancholic type' of personality of patients with severe unipolar major depression (melancholia) which resembles descriptions by psychoanalysts could be corroborated. This was also true for the 'manic type' of personality as a (premorbid) correlate of predominantly manic forms of a bipolar I disorder. As predicted from a spectrum concept of major affective disorders, the ratio of traits of either type co-varied with the ratio of the depressive and the manic components in the long-term course of such a disorder. The two types of premorbid personality and a rare variant of the 'manic type', named 'relaxed, easy-going type', were conceived as 'affective types' dominating in major affective disorders. They are opposed to three 'neurotoid types' prevailing in so-called neurotic disorders as well as in schizophrenic psychoses. The similarity among the types can be visualized as spatial relationships in a circular, i.e. a two-dimensional, model (circumplex). Personality disorders as maladapted extreme variants of personality are, by definition, located outside the circle, mainly along its 'neurotoid' side. However, due to their transitional nature, axis I disorders cannot be represented adequately within the plane which represents (adapted as well as maladapted) forms of habitual behaviour (personality types and disorders, respectively). To integrate them into the spatial model of similarity interrelations, a dimension of actual psychopathology has to be added to the two-dimensional plane as a third (orthogonal) axis. The distance of a case from the 'ground level' of habitual behaviour corresponds with the severity of the actual psychopathological state. The specific form of that state (e.g. manic or depressive), however, varies along one the axes which define the circumplex of habitual behaviour. This three-dimensional model is, by its very nature, more complex than the unidimensional one derived from Kretschmer's typological concept, but it is clearly more in accordance with empirical data.
一种关于正常气质、其精神病态变体与两种主要形式的所谓内源性精神病(重度情感障碍和精神分裂症)之间关系的一维模型源自克雷奇默的体质类型学。然而,该模型未通过生物统计学方法得到证实,克雷奇默关于环性气质的宽泛概念,即一方面与身体肥胖相关,另一方面与重度情感障碍相关,也未得到实证数据的支持。然而,严重单相重度抑郁症(忧郁症)患者的“忧郁型”人格概念类似于精神分析学家的描述,这一点可以得到证实。对于作为双相I型障碍主要躁狂形式的(病前)相关因素的“躁狂型”人格来说也是如此。正如从重度情感障碍的谱系概念所预测的那样,在这种障碍的长期病程中,两种类型特征的比例与抑郁和躁狂成分的比例共同变化。两种病前人格类型以及一种罕见的“躁狂型”变体,即“轻松随和型”,被视为在重度情感障碍中占主导地位的“情感类型”。它们与在所谓神经症性障碍以及精神分裂症性精神病中占主导地位的三种“类神经症类型”相对。这些类型之间的相似性可以在一个圆形的、即二维的模型(环性模型)中以空间关系的形式呈现出来。人格障碍作为人格适应不良的极端变体,根据定义,位于圆圈之外,主要沿着其“类神经症”一侧。然而,由于其过渡性质,轴I障碍无法在代表(适应良好以及适应不良)习惯性行为形式(分别为人格类型和障碍)的平面内得到充分体现。为了将它们整合到相似性相互关系的空间模型中,必须在二维平面上添加一个实际精神病理学维度作为第三个(正交)轴。一个病例与习惯性行为“基线水平”的距离与实际精神病理状态的严重程度相对应。然而,该状态的具体形式(例如躁狂或抑郁)沿着定义习惯性行为环性模型的其中一个轴变化。这个三维模型本质上比源自克雷奇默类型学概念的一维模型更为复杂,但显然更符合实证数据。