Thau K, Lenz G, Rieder N, Kubinger K, Grisar E
Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Wien.
Nervenarzt. 1991 Nov;62(11):682-8.
The aim of this study was to investigate personality profiles in patients with bipolar affective and schizoaffective disorder, classified according to ICD-9 criteria using objective psychological tests (Personal Research Form, Objective Analytical Test Battery, IPC-Query Form). The bipolar schizoaffective patients were further subtyped according to Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) into schizoaffective-affective and schizoaffective-schizophrenic patients. 81 patients took part in the study (29 bipolar affective and 52 bipolar schizoaffective patients; the latter were subtyped into 23 schizoaffective-schizophrenic and 29 schizoaffective-affective patients). We showed that the personality profiles are quite similar in schizoaffective-affective and schizoaffective-schizophrenic patients if compared to purely affective patients. But indeed there are pronounced differences between the schizoaffective-affective and the schizoaffective-schizophrenic subtypes, so that subtyping schizoaffective disorder like done in Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) seems to show that schizoaffective disorders are not a homogenous group.
本研究旨在通过使用客观心理测试（个人研究表、客观分析测试组、IPC查询表），依据国际疾病分类第九版（ICD - 9）标准，调查双相情感障碍和分裂情感性障碍患者的人格特征。双相分裂情感性障碍患者进一步根据研究诊断标准（RDC）分为分裂情感性-情感型和分裂情感性-精神分裂型患者。81名患者参与了该研究（29名双相情感障碍患者和52名双相分裂情感性障碍患者；后者又分为23名分裂情感性-精神分裂型患者和29名分裂情感性-情感型患者）。我们发现，与单纯情感障碍患者相比，分裂情感性-情感型和分裂情感性-精神分裂型患者的人格特征相当相似。但实际上，分裂情感性-情感型和分裂情感性-精神分裂型亚型之间存在显著差异，因此，如同研究诊断标准（RDC）那样对分裂情感性障碍进行亚型分类，似乎表明分裂情感性障碍并非一个同质群体。
