Erhard Lionel, Zobitz Mark E, Zhao Chunfeng, Amadio Peter C, An Kai-Nan
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Jun;84(6):1006-12. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200206000-00016.
Treatment of a partial laceration in zone 2 of a flexor tendon is controversial. The intact part of the tendon can usually sustain forces of normal unresisted motion, and repaired partially lacerated tendons can actually be weaker than unrepaired ones. However, complications such as triggering or entrapment have been reported in association with unrepaired tendons. The purpose of this study was to measure the biomechanical behavior following trimming of the tendon as an alternative to repair.
Thirty-six flexor digitorum profundus tendons were harvested from sixteen unpaired fresh-frozen cadaveric human hands and were randomly assigned to be subjected to either 50% or 75% partial laceration, which was either lateral or volar, and were then assigned to no repair, repair with a running suture, or trimming. Mean and maximum gliding resistances were measured as the flexor digitorum profundus glided through the bone-A2 pulley complex and the flexor digitorum superficialis. Values were normalized to those measured in the intact tendon. The tendons were then distracted to failure, and maximum load and stiffness were recorded.
There was triggering or entrapment of eight unrepaired tendons; two cases were severe, and six were minor. When no severe trigger was obvious, the unrepaired tendons had the lowest tendency for gliding resistance, followed by the tendons treated with trimming and then by those treated with the running suture. Overall, the tendons with a volar laceration had higher mean and maximum gliding resistance than those with a lateral laceration (p < 0.05), those with a 75% partial laceration had higher mean gliding resistance than those with a 50% laceration (p < 0.05), and the tendons that were repaired with running suture had higher mean gliding resistance than those treated with trimming (p < 0.05). Tendon strength was not significantly different among the three types of treatment.
From the perspective of gliding resistance after partial tendon laceration, no repair appears necessary unless triggering is a problem. If triggering occurs, then trimming of a partially lacerated tendon may be a reliable alternative to repair, at least in terms of gliding resistance and strength.
屈指肌腱二区部分撕裂伤的治疗存在争议。肌腱的完整部分通常能够承受正常无阻力运动的力量,而修复后的部分撕裂肌腱实际上可能比未修复的肌腱更脆弱。然而,已有报道称未修复的肌腱会出现如弹响或卡压等并发症。本研究的目的是测量肌腱修整后替代修复的生物力学行为。
从16只不成对的新鲜冷冻尸体人手中获取36条指深屈肌腱,随机分为50%或75%部分撕裂伤组,撕裂伤分别位于外侧或掌侧,然后分为不修复、连续缝合修复或修整组。当指深屈肌腱滑过骨 - A2滑车复合体和指浅屈肌时,测量平均和最大滑动阻力。将这些值标准化为在完整肌腱中测得的值。然后将肌腱拉伸至断裂,记录最大负荷和刚度。
8条未修复的肌腱出现弹响或卡压;2例严重,6例轻微。当无明显严重弹响时,未修复的肌腱滑动阻力倾向最低,其次是修整处理的肌腱,然后是连续缝合处理的肌腱。总体而言,掌侧撕裂伤的肌腱平均和最大滑动阻力高于外侧撕裂伤的肌腱(p < 0.05),75%部分撕裂伤的肌腱平均滑动阻力高于50%撕裂伤的肌腱(p < 0.05),连续缝合修复的肌腱平均滑动阻力高于修整处理的肌腱(p < 0.05)。三种治疗类型的肌腱强度无显著差异。
从部分肌腱撕裂伤后的滑动阻力角度来看,除非出现弹响问题,否则似乎无需修复。如果出现弹响,那么部分撕裂肌腱的修整可能是一种可靠的修复替代方法,至少在滑动阻力和强度方面如此。