Suppr超能文献

[传统针灸穴位与山本新头皮针穴位治疗中的疼痛变化]

[Variations of pain in the treatment of one classical acupuncture-point versus one point of Yamamoto's new scalp acupuncture].

作者信息

Ogal H P, Hafer J, Ogal M, Krumholz W, Herget H F, Hempelmann G

机构信息

Abteilung Anaesthesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2002 Jun;37(6):326-32. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32231.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In an experimental design the pain reduction effect of acupuncture is studied and compared to the treatment of a classical acupuncture point and a point of the Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture (YNSA).

METHODS

Experimental pain stimuli (32 per test person) were set in 42 test persons at the upper calcaneus edge and pain reduction was checked intra-individually by using the following variations of treatment: Acupuncture YNSA basis-point D, Acupuncture at the classical point Xiao Chang Shu = Bl 27, Acupuncture at a placebo point of the head, Acupuncture at a placebo point of the gluteal region.

RESULTS

Evaluation of the data as well as a statistical investigation using a bi-factoral variance analysis with repeated measurements of 2 respectively 1 factor yielded following results: There are highly significant differences concerning pain reduction through the stimulation of the YNSA basis-point D and the acupuncture at the classical point Bl 27 (p < 0,0007). There are also highly significant differences concerning the verum and the placebo treatment (p < 0,00006). Further hypothesis of controlling the experimental design were tested.

CONCLUSIONS

On the whole, the investigation shows that there is a marked difference between the verum and placebo treatment as well as a difference between the acupuncture of the YNSA basis-point D and the classical acupuncture point Xiao Chang Shu (Bl 27) with regard to pain reduction induced by experimental stimuli at the calcaneus. These differences are significant.

摘要

引言

在一项实验设计中,研究了针刺的止痛效果,并将其与经典穴位针刺和山本新头皮针(YNSA)穴位针刺的治疗效果进行比较。

方法

对42名受试者的跟骨上缘施加实验性疼痛刺激(每人32次),并通过以下治疗方式进行个体内止痛效果检查:针刺YNSA基础点D、针刺经典穴位小肠俞(BL27)、针刺头部安慰剂点、针刺臀区安慰剂点。

结果

对数据进行评估,并使用双因素方差分析进行统计调查,重复测量2个或1个因素,得出以下结果:通过刺激YNSA基础点D和针刺经典穴位BL27,在止痛效果上存在高度显著差异(p<0.0007)。在真实治疗和安慰剂治疗之间也存在高度显著差异(p<0.00006)。还对控制实验设计的进一步假设进行了测试。

结论

总体而言,研究表明,在跟骨实验性刺激引起的止痛方面,真实治疗和安慰剂治疗之间存在明显差异,YNSA基础点D针刺和经典穴位小肠俞(BL27)针刺之间也存在差异。这些差异具有显著性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验