• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对胃癌新的国际抗癌联盟(UICC)分期系统的重新评估:淋巴结分期存在的问题。

Reappraisal of the new UICC staging system for gastric cancer: problem in lymph node stage.

作者信息

Lee Wei-Jei, Hong Rey-Long, Lai I-Ru, Chen Chaung-Nien, Lee Po-Huang, Chung King-Chang

机构信息

Department of Surgery, En-Chu Kong Hospital, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 May-Jun;49(45):860-4.

PMID:12064008
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM staging system defined a new system for classifying gastric cancer, based on the number of metastatic nodes (1997). However, the advantage of the new system is still a matter of debate. The aim of the present study is to compare the new system with the old one (1987), which is based on the location of positive lymph nodes.

METHODOLOGY

We analyzed the survival of 608 patients with curative resection of their gastric cancer. The average number of resected and involved lymph nodes for each resected patient was 31.4 and 7.7. Comparison of these two systems was carried out to determine which classification was more effective. The prognostic value of different lymph node staging systems was also analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-five patients (22.2%) had different N classification and 109 (17.9%) had different TNM staging. There was a significant stepwise decrease of slope of survival curve for each stage, but the new system did not cleanly separate stage II with IIIa at 3 years and stage IIIb with IV at 5 years. Although different lymph node staging systems were able to predict survival, the ratio rather than the number of involved nodes had a more cleanly separated stepwise decrease of slope of survival curve.

CONCLUSIONS

The new UICC staging system is not better than the old system for the staging of gastric cancer. The reason is that the category of node number seems not to be appropriate and will be influenced by the extent of lymph node dissection. To overcome this problem, the frequency of involved nodes can be adopted instead of the number.

摘要

背景/目的:国际抗癌联盟(UICC)的TNM分期系统基于转移淋巴结数量定义了一种新的胃癌分类系统(1997年)。然而,新系统的优势仍存在争议。本研究的目的是将新系统与基于阳性淋巴结位置的旧系统(1987年)进行比较。

方法

我们分析了608例接受胃癌根治性切除术患者的生存情况。每位接受手术的患者切除和受累淋巴结的平均数量分别为31.4个和7.7个。对这两种系统进行比较以确定哪种分类更有效。还分析了不同淋巴结分期系统的预后价值。

结果

135例患者(22.2%)有不同的N分类,109例(17.9%)有不同的TNM分期。每个阶段的生存曲线斜率均有显著的逐步下降,但新系统在3年时未能清晰区分II期和IIIa期,在5年时未能清晰区分IIIb期和IV期。尽管不同的淋巴结分期系统能够预测生存情况,但受累淋巴结的比例而非数量在生存曲线斜率的逐步下降上有更清晰的区分。

结论

对于胃癌分期,新的UICC分期系统并不优于旧系统。原因是淋巴结数量类别似乎不合适,且会受到淋巴结清扫范围的影响。为克服这一问题,可采用受累淋巴结的频率而非数量。

相似文献

1
Reappraisal of the new UICC staging system for gastric cancer: problem in lymph node stage.对胃癌新的国际抗癌联盟(UICC)分期系统的重新评估:淋巴结分期存在的问题。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 May-Jun;49(45):860-4.
2
[Comparison of the prognostic value of UICC and JGCA lymph node staging criteria for gastric cancer].[UICC与JGCA胃癌淋巴结分期标准的预后价值比较]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2008 May;30(5):376-80.
3
A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma.胃癌转移淋巴结数量与淋巴结分期之间预后意义的比较。
Hepatogastroenterology. 1999 Nov-Dec;46(30):3281-6.
4
Metastatic lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer.转移淋巴结比率是胃癌的一个独立预后因素。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 May-Jun;56(91-92):908-13.
5
Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.胃癌淋巴结转移的分类:N 部位与 N 数字系统的比较。我们的经验及文献综述。
Am Surg. 2007 Apr;73(4):359-66.
6
Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems.胃癌的淋巴结转移:国际抗癌联盟(UICC)和日本系统的比较。
ANZ J Surg. 2004 Oct;74(10):852-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03188.x.
7
Comparative effect of lymph node metastasis classified by the anatomical site or by the number of nodes involved on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.根据淋巴结转移的解剖部位或受累淋巴结数量对胃癌患者预后进行分类的比较效果。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Nov-Dec;55(88):2269-72.
8
Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma.新版国际抗癌联盟胃癌TNM分期的评估
Cancer. 2000 Apr 15;88(8):1796-800.
9
The most appropriate category of metastatic lymph nodes to evaluate overall survival of gastric cancer following curative resection.评估胃癌根治性切除术后总生存的最适宜转移性淋巴结类别。
J Surg Oncol. 2008 Oct 1;98(5):343-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.21119.
10
Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: correlation between new and old UICC TNM classification.胃癌中的淋巴结转移:新旧国际抗癌联盟(UICC)TNM分类之间的相关性
Int Surg. 2001 Jan-Mar;86(1):14-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical value of regional lymph node sorting in gastric cancer.区域淋巴结分拣在胃癌中的临床价值
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Dec 15;14(12):2393-2403. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i12.2393.
2
Evaluation of the 7th AJCC TNM Staging System in Point of Lymph Node Classification.基于淋巴结分类评估第 7 版 AJCC TNM 分期系统。
J Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;11(2):94-100. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.94. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
3
Clinical implications of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer.胃癌中转移淋巴结比率的临床意义
BMC Cancer. 2007 Oct 24;7:200. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-200.