Bernhardt Barbara, Stemberger Joseph Paul
School of Audiology and Speech Sciences, University of British Columbia, 5804 Fairview Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2002 Apr-May;16(3):199-214. doi: 10.1080/02699200110112583.
Acquisition of intervocalic consonants has been insufficiently studied, both in terms of subject numbers, and in terms of differentiating syllabification patterns from those involving vowel feature assimilation. The question has remained: are English intervocalic consonants syllable-initial (onsets), syllable-final (codas) or ambisyllabic? This study addresses these issues in the speech of 44 English-speaking Canadian children with phonological disorders. Intervocalic consonants resembled word-initial onsets in that they were deleted less often than word-final consonants. When there was no deletion, intervocalic consonants were more likely to be segmentally unique (ambisyllabic?) than like onsets or codas. In segmental inventories, segments rarely appeared only in intervocalic position, and showed an equal affinity to onsets and codas, with two exceptions. Sonorant continuants and, to a lesser extent, fricatives showed patterns in intervocalic position that may have reflected assimilation. For children with less severe disorders, velars and fricatives occurred intervocalically only if they also occurred in codas, suggesting a coda-like (ambisyllabic?) status.
关于元音间辅音的习得,无论是在研究对象数量方面,还是在区分音节划分模式与涉及元音特征同化的模式方面,都缺乏充分的研究。问题依然存在:英语中的元音间辅音是音节开头(起首音)、音节结尾(收音)还是双音节的?本研究针对44名患有语音障碍的加拿大英语儿童的言语进行了这些问题的探讨。元音间辅音与单词开头的起首音相似,因为它们的省略频率低于单词末尾的辅音。当没有省略时,元音间辅音比起首音或收音更有可能在音段上是独特的(双音节的?)。在音段清单中,音段很少只出现在元音间位置,并且对起首音和收音表现出同等的亲和性,但有两个例外。响音延续音以及程度稍轻的擦音在元音间位置呈现出的模式可能反映了同化现象。对于障碍较轻的儿童,软腭音和擦音仅在它们也出现在收音位置时才会出现在元音间,这表明其具有类似收音(双音节的?)的地位。