Huelsenbeck J P, Nielsen R
Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA.
Syst Biol. 1999 Jun;48(2):317-28. doi: 10.1080/106351599260319.
All current phylogenetic methods assume that DNA substitutions are independent among sites. However, ample empirical evidence suggests that the process of substitution is not independent but is, in fact, temporally and spatially correlated. The robustness of several commonly used phylogenetic methods to the assumption of independent substitution is examined. A compound Poisson process is used to model DNA substitution. This model assumes that substitution events are Poisson-distributed in time and that the number of substitutions associated with each event is geometrically distributed. The asymptotic properties of phylogenetic methods do not appear to change under a compound Poisson process of DNA substitution. Moreover, the rank order of the performance of different methods does not change. However, all phylogenetic methods become less efficient when substitution follows a compound Poisson process.
目前所有的系统发育方法都假定DNA替换在各个位点之间是独立的。然而,大量的经验证据表明,替换过程并非独立,实际上在时间和空间上是相关的。研究了几种常用系统发育方法对于独立替换假设的稳健性。采用复合泊松过程对DNA替换进行建模。该模型假定替换事件在时间上呈泊松分布,且与每个事件相关的替换数量呈几何分布。在DNA替换的复合泊松过程下,系统发育方法的渐近性质似乎并未改变。此外,不同方法的性能排名顺序也未改变。然而,当替换遵循复合泊松过程时,所有系统发育方法的效率都会降低。