Tazzari P L, Ricci F, Vitale M, Malferrari F, Salama A, Schwind P, Conte R
Service of Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Transfus Med. 2002 Jun;12(3):193-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.2002.00376.x.
A total of 70 serum samples from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT II) patients, non-HIT patients and healthy subjects, respectively, were studied for the presence of antiheparin/PF4 antibodies. Two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assays were compared with the particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA). Beads of the PaGIA kit were also used to evaluate the feasibility of flow cytometric detection of antiheparin/PF4 antibodies in patient samples. Experiments have shown that all samples found positive by ELISA and PaGIA, were also positive when analysed by flow cytometry by an indirect test using the high-density particles coated with heparin/PF4 complexes and a second step fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) antihuman immunoglobulin (Ig)G reagent. The procedure was easy to perform, repetitive and beads were promptly visualized by physical parameters, with a very low background. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that flow cytometry is a reliable method for the detection of antiheparin/PF4 antibodies.
分别对70份来自肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT II)患者、非HIT患者和健康受试者的血清样本进行了抗肝素/PF4抗体检测。将两种酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)方法与颗粒凝胶免疫测定(PaGIA)进行了比较。PaGIA试剂盒的磁珠也用于评估流式细胞术检测患者样本中抗肝素/PF4抗体的可行性。实验表明,所有通过ELISA和PaGIA检测为阳性的样本,在用包被有肝素/PF4复合物的高密度颗粒和第二步异硫氰酸荧光素(FITC)抗人免疫球蛋白(Ig)G试剂进行间接检测的流式细胞术中分析时也呈阳性。该方法操作简便、可重复,磁珠可通过物理参数迅速可视化,背景极低。总之,本研究结果表明流式细胞术是检测抗肝素/PF4抗体的可靠方法。