Department of Haematology, Central Haematology Laboratory, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland.
Haematologica. 2012 Jan;97(1):89-97. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.048074. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
The current gold-standard for diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is the detection of platelet-activating antibodies by means of functional assays which, since they are time consuming and not widely available, are not suited to guiding acute treatment decisions. The objective of our study was to assess the ability of more rapid immunoassays to predict the presence of functionally relevant anti-platelet factor 4/heparin-antibodies.
We analyzed 1,291 of 1,383 (93.4%) patients consecutively evaluated for suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia at our institution. Clinical pre-test probability was defined by the 4T-score. Anti-platelet factor 4/heparin-antibodies were measured with three immunoassays (ID-H/PF4-PaGIA, Asserachrom-HPIA, and GTI-PF4) and their functional relevance was assessed by a two-point heparin-induced platelet aggregation test. Performance of the immunoassays was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Among 1,291 patients, 96 (7.4%) had a positive heparin-induced platelet aggregation-test: 7 of 859 (0.8%) with a low, 50 of 358 (14.0%) with an intermediate, and 39 of 74 (52.7%) with a high 4T-score. Receiver operating characteristics analysis indicated that best immunoassay thresholds for predicting a positive platelet aggregation test were: Titer of 4 or more (ID-H/PF4-PaGIA), optical density more than 0.943 (Asserachrom-HPIA) and more than 1.367 (GTI-PF4). A 100% negative predictive value was observed at the following thresholds: Titer of 1 or under (ID-H/PF4-PaGIA), optical density less than 0.300 (Asserachrom-HPIA) and less than 0.870 (GTI-PF4). A 100% positive predictive value was reached only by ID-H/PF4-PaGIA, at titers of 32 or over. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated for results between the thresholds with 100% negative or positive predictive value.
We show that: i) negative and weak positive results of immunoassays detecting anti-platelet factor 4/heparin-antibodies exclude heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; ii) anti-platelet factor 4/heparin-antibody titers of 32 or over (ID-H/PF4-PaGIA) have a 100% positive predictive value for functionally relevant antibodies; iii) combining the clinical pre-test probability with the likelihood ratio of intermediate immunoassay results allows assessment of post-test probability for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in individual patients.
目前,诊断肝素诱导的血小板减少症的金标准是通过功能检测来检测血小板激活抗体,由于这些检测耗时且不广泛可用,因此不适合指导急性治疗决策。我们的研究目的是评估更快速的免疫测定法预测功能相关抗血小板因子 4/肝素抗体存在的能力。
我们分析了在我院连续评估的 1383 例疑似肝素诱导的血小板减少症患者中的 1291 例(93.4%)。临床预测试验概率由 4T 评分定义。使用三种免疫测定法(ID-H/PF4-PaGIA、Asserachrom-HPIA 和 GTI-PF4)测量抗血小板因子 4/肝素抗体,并通过两点肝素诱导的血小板聚集试验评估其功能相关性。通过接收者操作特征分析评估免疫测定法的性能。
在 1291 例患者中,96 例(7.4%)的肝素诱导血小板聚集试验阳性:859 例中有 7 例(0.8%)为低滴度,358 例中有 50 例(14.0%)为中滴度,74 例中有 39 例(52.7%)为高 4T 评分。接收者操作特征分析表明,预测血小板聚集试验阳性的最佳免疫测定法阈值为:效价 4 或更高(ID-H/PF4-PaGIA)、光密度大于 0.943(Asserachrom-HPIA)和大于 1.367(GTI-PF4)。在以下阈值下观察到 100%阴性预测值:效价 1 或更低(ID-H/PF4-PaGIA)、光密度小于 0.300(Asserachrom-HPIA)和小于 0.870(GTI-PF4)。仅 ID-H/PF4-PaGIA 在效价为 32 或更高时达到 100%阳性预测值。对于具有 100%阴性或阳性预测值的阈值之间的结果,计算了阳性和阴性似然比。
我们表明:i)免疫测定法检测抗血小板因子 4/肝素抗体的阴性和弱阳性结果可排除肝素诱导的血小板减少症;ii)ID-H/PF4-PaGIA 中效价为 32 或更高的抗血小板因子 4/肝素抗体具有功能相关抗体的 100%阳性预测值;iii)结合临床预测试验概率和中间免疫测定结果的似然比,可以评估个体患者肝素诱导的血小板减少症的后测试验概率。