Busse Jason W, Kulkarni Abhaya V, Campbell James B, Injeyan H Stephen
Oncidium Health Group Inc., Burlington, Ont.
CMAJ. 2002 Jun 11;166(12):1531-4.
Although the Canadian Chiropractic Association and the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC) endorse vaccination, the prevalence of anti-vaccination attitudes among Canadian chiropractors is unknown. This study describes the prevalence of anti-vaccination attitudes among Canadian chiropractic students.
An 11-item questionnaire about attitudes toward vaccination was distributed to students enrolled at CMCC during the 1999/2000 academic year. The responses for the 11 items were then summed to arrive at a total score ranging from 0 (most negative attitude toward vaccination) to 22 (most positive attitude toward vaccination). Respondents' perceptions of sources of vaccine information were also investigated.
Over 75% of the students (467 of 621) completed the questionnaire. Most students (53.3%) reported that in general they agreed with vaccination. This was especially true among first-year students (60.7%). However, among fourth year students, only 39.5% agreed with vaccination. The proportion of respondents who stated that they were against vaccination in general was 5 (4.5%) of 112 first-year students, 10 (8.3%) of 121 second-year students, 16 (13.9%) of 115 third-year students and 35 (29.4%) of 119 fourth-year students. The mean scores on the questionnaire were progressively lower with each higher year of study at the College. The mean survey scores for each year of study were first year, 15.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.2-16.6); second year, 16.1 (95% CI 15.3-1 7.0); third year, 14.5 (95% CI 13.5-15.4); and fourth year, 12.8 (95% CI 11.7-13.9). The mean scores varied among year of study and were statistically significant using one-way ANOVA (p < 0.0001). Among students who relied primarily on informal sources of vaccine information, such as the chiropractic literature and informal talks at CMCC, anti-vaccination attitudes were more prevalent in later years.
Most CMCC students reported pro-vaccination attitudes, but there appeared to be an increase in anti-vaccination attitudes as students progressed through the CMCC program. This pattern was seen almost exclusively among students who relied primarily on informal sources of vaccine information rather than on core CMCC lectures or prior lectures at university.
尽管加拿大整脊协会和加拿大纪念整脊学院(CMCC)支持接种疫苗,但加拿大整脊师中反疫苗态度的流行情况尚不清楚。本研究描述了加拿大整脊专业学生中反疫苗态度的流行情况。
在1999/2000学年,向CMCC注册的学生发放了一份关于疫苗接种态度的11项问卷。然后将这11项的回答相加,得出总分范围为0(对疫苗接种态度最消极)至22(对疫苗接种态度最积极)。还调查了受访者对疫苗信息来源的看法。
超过75%的学生(621名中的467名)完成了问卷。大多数学生(53.3%)报告说,总体上他们同意接种疫苗。一年级学生中尤其如此(60.7%)。然而,在四年级学生中,只有39.5%的人同意接种疫苗。表示总体上反对接种疫苗的受访者比例在112名一年级学生中有5名(4.5%),121名二年级学生中有10名(8.3%),115名三年级学生中有16名(13.9%),119名四年级学生中有35名(29.4%)。随着在学院学习年级的升高,问卷的平均得分逐渐降低。各学习年份的平均调查得分分别为:一年级,15.9(95%置信区间[CI]15.2 - 16.6);二年级,16.1(95%CI 15.3 - 17.0);三年级,14.5(95%CI 13.5 - 15.4);四年级,12.8(95%CI 11.7 - 13.9)。平均得分在不同学习年份之间存在差异,使用单因素方差分析具有统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。在主要依赖非正式疫苗信息来源(如整脊文献和CMCC的非正式讲座)的学生中,反疫苗态度在后期更为普遍。
大多数CMCC学生报告了支持接种疫苗的态度,但随着学生在CMCC课程中的进展,反疫苗态度似乎有所增加。这种模式几乎只在主要依赖非正式疫苗信息来源而非CMCC核心讲座或大学先前讲座的学生中出现。