Campbell J B, Busse J W, Injeyan H S
Department of Medical Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4):E43. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.4.e43.
Although there is overwhelming evidence to show that vaccination is a highly effective method of controlling infectious diseases, a vocal element of the chiropractic profession maintains a strongly antivaccination bias. Reasons for this are examined. The basis seems to lie in early chiropractic philosophy, which, eschewing both the germ theory of infectious disease and vaccination, considered disease the result of spinal nerve dysfunction caused by misplaced (subluxated) vertebrae. Although rejected by medical science, this concept is still accepted by a minority of chiropractors. Although more progressive, evidence-based chiropractors have embraced the concept of vaccination, the rejection of it by conservative chiropractors continues to have a negative influence on both public acceptance of vaccination and acceptance of the chiropractic profession by orthodox medicine.
尽管有大量证据表明接种疫苗是控制传染病的一种高效方法,但整脊疗法行业中有一部分人却强烈反对接种疫苗。本文探讨了其中的原因。其根源似乎在于早期的整脊疗法理念,该理念既摒弃了传染病的病菌理论,也反对接种疫苗,认为疾病是由椎骨错位(半脱位)导致的脊神经功能障碍所致。尽管这一概念已被医学科学所否定,但仍有少数整脊治疗师接受它。尽管更具前瞻性、基于证据的整脊治疗师已经接受了接种疫苗的理念,但保守的整脊治疗师对其的抵制仍然对公众对接种疫苗的接受程度以及正统医学对整脊疗法行业的认可度产生负面影响。