El Azab S R, Rosseel P M J, De Lange J J, van Wijk E M, van Strik R, Scheffer G J
Thoraxcentre Ignatius Breda, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Netherlands.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Apr;19(4):276-82. doi: 10.1017/s0265021502000443.
Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass triggers an inflammatory response involving pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 8 (IL-8). We investigated whether different anaesthetic techniques alter the pro-inflammatory cytokine response to cardiac surgery.
Thirty patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery were randomized into three groups of 10 patients. They received either volatile inhalation induction and maintenance (Group 1) or total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and a minimal dose sufentanil (Group 2) or a moderate dose midazolam-sufentanil (Group 3). The effect of the different anaesthetic techniques on plasma levels of TNF-alpha, IL-6 and IL-8 were examined during and after anaesthesia.
Concentrations of TNF-alpha, and IL-8 were comparable in the three groups throughout all measurements. Before the start of cardiopulmonary bypass, IL-6 was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P = 0.009) or Group 3 (P = 0.030), but there were no differences between groups after cardiopulmonary bypass or postoperatively. In the three groups there was a positive correlation between aortic clamping time and serum concentrations of IL-6 (r = 0.54) and IL-8 (r = 0.62). Length of stay in intensive care was correlated with high levels of TNF-alpha (r = 0.78).
Albeit there is difference between the volatile induction and maintenance of the anaesthesia method and the total intravenous anaesthesia technique on the pro-inflammatory cytokine response to surgical stimulation before starting of cardiopulmonary bypass, neither technique can modify the pro-inflammatory cytokine response to ischaemia-reperfusion or extracorporeal circulation.
体外循环心脏手术会引发炎症反应,涉及肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素6(IL-6)和白细胞介素8(IL-8)等促炎细胞因子。我们研究了不同麻醉技术是否会改变心脏手术中促炎细胞因子的反应。
30例计划行择期冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者被随机分为三组,每组10例。他们分别接受挥发性吸入诱导和维持麻醉(第1组)、丙泊酚和小剂量舒芬太尼全静脉麻醉(第2组)或中剂量咪达唑仑-舒芬太尼麻醉(第3组)。在麻醉期间及麻醉后,检测不同麻醉技术对血浆中TNF-α、IL-6和IL-8水平的影响。
在所有测量过程中,三组中TNF-α和IL-8的浓度相当。在体外循环开始前,第1组的IL-6显著高于第2组(P = 0.009)或第3组(P = 0.030),但在体外循环后或术后各组之间无差异。三组中,主动脉阻断时间与IL-6(r = 0.54)和IL-8(r = 0.62)的血清浓度呈正相关。重症监护病房的住院时间与高水平的TNF-α相关(r = 0.78)。
尽管在体外循环开始前,挥发性吸入诱导和维持麻醉方法与全静脉麻醉技术在对手术刺激的促炎细胞因子反应方面存在差异,但两种技术均不能改变对缺血-再灌注或体外循环的促炎细胞因子反应。