Gourley I S, Kearns J, McKeen M, Birkos S, Brown M, Kamoun Malek
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine university of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19035, USA.
Tissue Antigens. 2002 Mar;59(3):211-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2002.590305.x.
Until recently, the majority of newly recruited volunteer donors were typed for HLA-A and -B by serology onto the National Marrow Donor Program Registry. Quality control of this serological typing performed by contracted laboratories was carried out by retesting approximately 1% of each laboratory's test volume utilizing DNA-based techniques (SSOP). The criteria used for selection included samples presumed to be homozygotes, samples with split antigen specificities and samples with antigens considered to be difficult to define. Out of 1983 samples analyzed, 156 HLA-A (3.9%) and 265 HLA-B (6.7%) locus discrepancies were identified. Review of these discrepancies by both the serological and QC laboratory revealed that the majority of discrepancies were due to errors in serological typing. Serological discrepancies were categorized as follows: blank antigens identified (36.8%) and misassignments (63.2%). Misassignments were defined as either the incorrect assignment of antigens within a group ("wrong split"), or a complete misassignment. Antigens reported as blanks most frequently belonged to the A19 and A28 groups and to the B70, 46 and 40 groups. The most frequent misassignments within groups were the A19 and A10 groups, and the B40 and B15 groups. Other HLA-A misassignments included A2 vs A28 or A2 vs A69, while other HLA-B misassignments included B35 and B70. This QC analysis showed that serological typing of class I antigens for the purposes of NMDP registry typing is prone to a significant error rate. Careful evaluation and selection of contracted laboratories by the NMDP suggests methodological limitations rather than poor performance as the main cause of these observations.
直到最近,大多数新招募的志愿捐献者都是通过血清学方法对HLA - A和 - B进行分型,并录入国家骨髓捐献计划登记处。由签约实验室进行的这种血清学分型的质量控制,是通过使用基于DNA的技术(序列特异性寡核苷酸探针法)对每个实验室检测量的约1%进行重新检测来实现的。选择的标准包括推测为纯合子的样本、具有分裂抗原特异性的样本以及被认为难以定义的抗原样本。在分析的1983个样本中,发现了156个HLA - A位点差异(3.9%)和265个HLA - B位点差异(6.7%)。血清学实验室和质量控制实验室对这些差异进行复查后发现,大多数差异是由于血清学分型错误所致。血清学差异分类如下:识别出的空白抗原(36.8%)和错误分配(63.2%)。错误分配被定义为组内抗原的错误分配(“错误分裂”)或完全错误分配。报告为空白的抗原最常属于A19和A28组以及B70、46和40组。组内最常见的错误分配是A19和A10组以及B40和B15组。其他HLA - A错误分配包括A2与A28或A2与A69,而其他HLA - B错误分配包括B35和B70。这种质量控制分析表明,为国家骨髓捐献计划登记处分型目的进行的I类抗原血清学分型容易出现显著的错误率。国家骨髓捐献计划对签约实验室进行仔细评估和选择表明,这些观察结果的主要原因是方法学上的局限性而非表现不佳。