Heidenreich Axel, Desgrandschamps F, Terrier F
Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Eur Urol. 2002 Apr;41(4):351-62. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00064-7.
Acute flank pain is a common and complex clinical problem which might be caused by a variety of urinary and extraurinary abnormalities among which ureterolithiasis being the most frequent cause. Plain abdominal radiographs combined with intravenous urography (IVU) have been the standard imaging procedures of choice for the evaluation of acute flank pain over the last decades. Direct detection of even small ureteral calculi is achieved in 40-60%, whereas using indirect signs such as ureteral and renal pelvic dilatation stone detection is possible in up to 80-90% of all cases. However, IVU might be hampered by poor quality due to lack of bowel preparation, by nephrotoxicity of contrast agents, by serious allergic and anaphylactic reactions in 10% and 1% of the patients, respectively, and by significant radiation exposure. The use of ultrasonography (US) in the management of acute flank pain has been growing and when combining the findings of pyeloureteral dilatation, direct visualization of stones, and the absence of ureteral ejaculation, the sensitivity to detect ureteral dilatation can be as high as 96%. Recently, unenhanced helical CT (UHCT) has been introduced as imaging modality with a high sensitivity and specificity for the evaluation of acute flank pain. UHCT has been demonstrated to be superior since (1) it detects ureteral stones with a sensitivity and specificity from 98% to 100% regardless of size, location and chemical composition, (2) it identifies extraurinary causes of flank pain in about one third of all patients presenting with acute flank pain, (3) it does not need contrast agent, and (4) it is a time saving imaging technique being performed within 5min. Based on the data published, one can predict that UHCT will become the imaging procedure of choice for evaluation of acute flank pain within the next years. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the role all imaging modalities available for a modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain with regard to their sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and their complications, toxicicty and morbidity.
急性胁腹痛是一个常见且复杂的临床问题,可能由多种泌尿系统及泌尿系统外的异常情况引起,其中输尿管结石是最常见的病因。在过去几十年里,腹部平片联合静脉肾盂造影(IVU)一直是评估急性胁腹痛的标准影像学检查方法。直接检测出哪怕是小的输尿管结石的概率为40% - 60%,而利用输尿管和肾盂扩张等间接征象,在所有病例中结石检测率可达80% - 90%。然而,IVU可能因肠道准备不佳导致图像质量差、造影剂的肾毒性、分别有10%和1%的患者出现严重过敏和过敏反应以及显著的辐射暴露而受到影响。超声检查(US)在急性胁腹痛的处理中的应用一直在增加,当结合肾盂输尿管扩张、结石的直接可视化以及输尿管喷射缺失的表现时,检测输尿管扩张的敏感性可高达96%。最近,非增强螺旋CT(UHCT)已作为一种对急性胁腹痛评估具有高敏感性和特异性的影像学检查方法被引入。UHCT已被证明具有优势,因为(1)它检测输尿管结石的敏感性和特异性在98%至100%之间,与结石大小、位置和化学成分无关;(2)在所有出现急性胁腹痛的患者中,约三分之一能识别出胁腹痛的泌尿系统外病因;(3)它不需要造影剂;(4)它是一种节省时间的影像学技术,5分钟内即可完成。基于已发表的数据,可以预测在未来几年UHCT将成为评估急性胁腹痛的首选影像学检查方法。本综述的目的是严格评估所有可用的影像学检查方法在急性胁腹痛现代诊断和处理方法中的作用,包括它们的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及它们的并发症、毒性和发病率。