• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在泰国北部患者中,肌肉注射双氯芬酸治疗急性肾绞痛的疗效优于静脉注射曲马多:一项随机双盲、假对照试验。

Superior efficacy of intramuscular diclofenac compared to intravenous tramadol for acute renal colic in northern Thai patients: A randomised double-blind, sham-controlled trial.

作者信息

Yaowalaorng Jarupa, Kunthasook Wiracha, Lokeskrawee Thanin, Patumanond Jayanton, Wongyikul Pakpoom, Lawanaskol Suppachai, Udornpim Narada

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Lampang Hospital, Lampang, Thailand.

Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Feb;37(1):e14550. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14550.

DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.14550
PMID:39763427
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11704847/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to compare time to effective pain relief between diclofenac 75 mg intramuscular (IM) and tramadol 50 mg intravenous (IV) for ED patients with acute renal colic.

METHODS

A randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled, superiority trial was conducted. Patients diagnosed with acute renal colic (hydronephrosis and/or stone visualisation on point-of-care ultrasound) in the ED were randomly assigned to receive an IM injection of 75 mg of diclofenac or IV tramadol 50 mg. Pain relief was defined as a numerical rating scale reduction of two or more points (standard 0-10 scale) and a reduction of at least one level of pain transition question ('much better', 'little better', 'unchanged', 'little worse', 'much worse'). The primary outcome was the multivariable-adjusted subdistribution-hazard ratio (SHRs) within 120 min in the ED, estimated using the cumulative incidence function (CIF). The secondary outcome compared the average time to pain relief using the restricted mean survival time (RMST).

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients were randomised, with 34 patients allocated to each group. At the 120 min, pain relief was reported in diclofenac and tramadol, 32 (94%) and 22 (65%) patients respectively. SHR was 2.86 (95% CI: 1.80-4.55; P value <0.001). For diclofenac and tramadol, the RMSTs were 37.09 min (95% CI: 30.00, 44.15) and 78.74 min (95% CI: 66.49, 90.99) respectively, with the difference of 41.67 min (95% CI: 55.71, 27.62).

CONCLUSION

Diclofenac 75 mg IM provides faster effective pain relief compared with tramadol 50 mg IV.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较双氯芬酸75毫克肌内注射(IM)和曲马多50毫克静脉注射(IV)对急诊科急性肾绞痛患者实现有效止痛的时间。

方法

进行了一项随机、双盲、假对照的优效性试验。急诊科中被诊断为急性肾绞痛(即时超声检查显示肾积水和/或结石)的患者被随机分配接受75毫克双氯芬酸的肌内注射或50毫克曲马多的静脉注射。疼痛缓解定义为数字评分量表降低两分或更多分(标准0 - 10分制)以及疼痛转变问题的等级至少降低一级(“好多了”“稍好一点”“无变化”“稍差一点”“差得多”)。主要结局是急诊科120分钟内使用累积发病率函数(CIF)估计的多变量调整后亚分布风险比(SHRs)。次要结局使用受限平均生存时间(RMST)比较平均止痛时间。

结果

共68例患者被随机分组,每组34例。在120分钟时,双氯芬酸组和曲马多组分别有32例(94%)和22例(65%)患者报告疼痛缓解。亚分布风险比为2.86(95%置信区间:1.80 - 4.55;P值<0.001)。双氯芬酸组和曲马多组的受限平均生存时间分别为37.09分钟(95%置信区间:30.00,44.15)和78.74分钟(95%置信区间:66.49,90.99),差值为41.67分钟(95%置信区间:55.71,27.62)。

结论

与50毫克曲马多静脉注射相比,75毫克双氯芬酸肌内注射能更快实现有效止痛。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcac/11704847/b9d951da027f/EMM-37-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcac/11704847/9b98f7715412/EMM-37-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcac/11704847/3742bcad3a81/EMM-37-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcac/11704847/b9d951da027f/EMM-37-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcac/11704847/9b98f7715412/EMM-37-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcac/11704847/3742bcad3a81/EMM-37-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcac/11704847/b9d951da027f/EMM-37-0-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Superior efficacy of intramuscular diclofenac compared to intravenous tramadol for acute renal colic in northern Thai patients: A randomised double-blind, sham-controlled trial.在泰国北部患者中,肌肉注射双氯芬酸治疗急性肾绞痛的疗效优于静脉注射曲马多:一项随机双盲、假对照试验。
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Feb;37(1):e14550. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14550.
2
Delivering safe and effective analgesia for management of renal colic in the emergency department: a double-blind, multigroup, randomised controlled trial.在急诊科管理肾绞痛时提供安全有效的镇痛:一项双盲、多组、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):1999-2007. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
3
Randomized double blinded placebo controlled trial comparing diclofenac and piroxicam in management of acute renal colic and its clinical implications.比较双氯芬酸和吡罗昔康治疗急性肾绞痛的随机双盲安慰剂对照试验及其临床意义。
Urol J. 2015 Apr 29;12(2):2069-73.
4
Magnesium Sulfate Versus Lidocaine as an Adjunct for Renal Colic in the Emergency Department: A Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial.硫酸镁与利多卡因在急诊科肾绞痛中的辅助治疗:一项随机、双盲对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Dec;84(6):670-677. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.06.015. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
5
Postoperative sensitization and pain after cesarean delivery and the effects of single im doses of tramadol and diclofenac alone and in combination.剖宫产术后的致敏反应与疼痛以及单次肌内注射曲马多和双氯芬酸单独及联合使用的效果
Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):526-533. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068823.89628.F5.
6
Intramuscular tramadol vs. diclofenac sodium for the treatment of acute migraine attacks in emergency department: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study.急诊科肌肉注射曲马多与双氯芬酸钠治疗急性偏头痛发作的前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
J Headache Pain. 2005 Jun;6(3):143-8. doi: 10.1007/s10194-005-0169-y. Epub 2005 May 13.
7
Intradermal sterile water injection versus diclofenac sodium in acute renal colic pain: A randomized controlled trial.急性肾绞痛中皮内注射无菌水与双氯芬酸钠的对比:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;44:395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.079. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
8
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for acute renal colic.用于急性肾绞痛的非甾体抗炎药
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 14;3(3):CD006027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006027.pub3.
9
Intradermal Sterile Water Injection: Safe and Effective Alternative for Relief of Acute Renal Colic in the Emergency Department.皮内注射无菌用水:急诊科缓解急性肾绞痛的安全有效替代方法。
J Emerg Med. 2024 Feb;66(2):83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.10.014. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
10
Intramuscular versus oral diclofenac for acute pain in adults with acute musculoskeletal injuries presenting to the ED setting: a prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial.肌肉内注射与口服双氯芬酸治疗急诊就诊的急性肌肉骨骼损伤成人急性疼痛:一项前瞻性、双盲、双模拟、随机对照试验。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Jul;36(7):401-406. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208214. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The efficacy of prophylactic metoclopramide in preventing nausea and vomiting in patients with acute pain treated with intravenous tramadol: a randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.预防性甲氧氯普胺预防静脉注射曲马多治疗的急性疼痛患者恶心和呕吐的疗效:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
BMC Res Notes. 2023 Jul 27;16(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06395-y.
2
Sex differences in opioid receptor mediated effects: Role of androgens.阿片受体介导作用的性别差异:雄激素的作用。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Mar;134:104522. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104522. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
3
Full Opioid Agonists and Tramadol: Pharmacological and Clinical Considerations.
完全阿片类激动剂与曲马多:药理学及临床考量
Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Sep 6;11(4):e119156. doi: 10.5812/aapm.119156. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Assessing baseline dependency of anchor-based minimal important change (MIC): don't stratify on the baseline score!评估基于锚点的最小有意义变化(MIC)的基线依赖关系:不要在基线得分上分层!
Qual Life Res. 2021 Oct;30(10):2773-2782. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02886-2. Epub 2021 May 26.
5
Dynamic RMST curves for survival analysis in clinical trials.用于临床试验生存分析的动态受限平均生存时间曲线
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Aug 27;20(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01098-5.
6
Iatrogenic Injury to the Sciatic Nerve due to Intramuscular Injection: A Case Report.因肌肉注射导致的坐骨神经医源性损伤:一例报告
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2019 Apr 8;15(1):61-66. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2019.15.e4. eCollection 2019 Apr.
7
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, Opioids, and Paracetamol in the Treatment of Acute Renal Colic.一种系统评价和荟萃分析比较非甾体抗炎药、阿片类药物和对乙酰氨基酚治疗急性肾绞痛的疗效。
Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):583-595. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
8
Discovery and development of tramadol for the treatment of pain.曲马多用于疼痛治疗的发现与研发。
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2017 Dec;12(12):1281-1291. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2017.1377697. Epub 2017 Sep 17.
9
Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain.对患者至关重要的疼痛缓解:评估急性疼痛最小临床重要差异的实证研究的系统评价
BMC Med. 2017 Feb 20;15(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0775-3.
10
Analgesic Effects and Safety of Desmopressin, Tramadol and Indomethacin in Patients with Acute Renal Colic; A Randomized Clinical Trial.去氨加压素、曲马多和吲哚美辛对急性肾绞痛患者的镇痛效果及安全性:一项随机临床试验
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2015 Apr;3(2):41-5.