Rambaldi A, Gluud C
Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, H:S Rigshopitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark, DK-2100.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD002800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002800.
Alcohol is the most common cause of liver disease in the Western world today. Randomised clinical trials have addressed the question whether propylthiouracil has any efficacy in patients with alcoholic liver disease.
The objectives were to assess the efficacy of propylthiouracil on mortality, clinical symptoms and complications, liver biochemistry, and liver histology in patients with alcoholic liver disease. Adverse events were also analysed.
The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (searched July 2001), The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2001), MEDLINE (January 1966 to July 2001), EMBASE (January 1985 to July 2001) were searched. These electronic searches were combined with full text searches. Manufacturers and researchers in the field were also contacted.
Randomised clinical trials studying patients with alcoholic steatosis, alcoholic fibrosis, alcoholic hepatitis, and/or alcoholic cirrhosis were included. Interventions encompassed propylthiouracil at any dose versus placebo or no intervention. The trials could be double-blind, single-blind, or unblinded. The trials could be unpublished or published as an article, an abstract, or a letter and no language limitations were applied.
All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat method. The statistical package (RevMan and MetaView) provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used. The methodological quality of the randomised clinical trials was evaluated by components of quality and the Jadad-scale.
Combining the results of six randomised clinical trials including 710 patients demonstrated no significant effects of propylthiouracil versus placebo on mortality (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.40), liver related mortality (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.33), complications of the liver disease (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.24), or liver histology. Propylthiouracil was associated with a non significant trend towards an increased risk of non-serious adverse events (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.99) and with the seldom occurrence of serious adverse events (leukopenia).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review could not demonstrate any significant efficacy of propylthiouracil on any clinically important outcomes (mortality, liver related mortality, liver complications, and liver histology) of patients with alcoholic liver disease and propylthiouracil was associated with adverse events. Accordingly, there is no evidence for using propylthiouracil for alcoholic liver disease outside randomised clinical trials.
酒精是当今西方世界肝脏疾病最常见的病因。随机临床试验探讨了丙硫氧嘧啶对酒精性肝病患者是否具有疗效这一问题。
旨在评估丙硫氧嘧啶对酒精性肝病患者的死亡率、临床症状及并发症、肝脏生化指标和肝脏组织学的疗效。同时分析不良事件。
检索了Cochrane肝胆疾病组对照试验注册库(2001年7月检索)、Cochrane对照试验注册库(Cochrane图书馆2001年第3期)、MEDLINE(1966年1月至2001年7月)、EMBASE(1985年1月至2001年7月)。这些电子检索与全文检索相结合。还联系了该领域的制造商和研究人员。
纳入研究酒精性脂肪变性、酒精性纤维化、酒精性肝炎和/或酒精性肝硬化患者的随机临床试验。干预措施包括任何剂量的丙硫氧嘧啶与安慰剂或不干预进行对比。试验可以是双盲、单盲或非盲的。试验可以是未发表的,或发表为文章、摘要或信函,且无语言限制。
所有分析均按照意向性治疗方法进行。使用Cochrane协作网提供的统计软件包(RevMan和MetaView)。通过质量成分和Jadad量表评估随机临床试验的方法学质量。
综合6项随机临床试验(共710例患者)的结果表明,与安慰剂相比,丙硫氧嘧啶对死亡率(Peto比值比(OR)0.91,95%置信区间(CI)0.59至1.40)、肝脏相关死亡率(OR 0.78,95%CI 0.45至1.33)、肝脏疾病并发症(OR 1.14,95%CI 0.58至2.24)或肝脏组织学均无显著影响。丙硫氧嘧啶与非严重不良事件风险增加的非显著趋势相关(OR 1.49,95%CI 0.74至2.99),且严重不良事件(白细胞减少症)很少发生。
本系统评价未能证明丙硫氧嘧啶对酒精性肝病患者的任何临床重要结局(死亡率、肝脏相关死亡率、肝脏并发症和肝脏组织学)具有显著疗效,且丙硫氧嘧啶与不良事件相关。因此,在随机临床试验之外,没有证据支持将丙硫氧嘧啶用于酒精性肝病。