Kawata Shuji, Murakami Takamichi, Kim Tonsok, Hori Masatoshi, Federle Michael P, Kumano Seishi, Sugihara Eiji, Makino Shigeru, Nakamura Hironobu, Kudo Masayuki
Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine D1, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871 Japan.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jul;179(1):61-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.1.1790061.
The objective of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic impact of varying slice thickness on multidetector CT to optimize detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma.
Forty-three patients with 87 hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas (diameter: range, 3-80 mm; mean, 22 mm) and 19 patients with either chronic hepatitis or liver cirrhosis and without hepatocellular carcinoma who had undergone early arterial and late arterial phase imaging of the entire liver on multidetector CT were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The detector row configuration was 2.5 x 4 mm, the pitch was 6, and the scanning time was 10.5 sec for each phase. All patients received contrast medium (2 mL/kg of body weight) at a rate of 5 mL/sec; the mean scanning delay for the early arterial phase was 19.0 sec, and the mean delay for the late arterial phase was 34.5 sec. Eighty 2.5-mm-thick reconstruction images, forty 5-mm-thick reconstruction images, and twenty-six 7.5-mm-thick reconstruction images were obtained for each phase. Each image set was interpreted separately by three observers to detect hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma by viewing images on a workstation monitor. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)) were calculated. We used retrospectively excellent follow-up and imaging or pathologic proof as the gold standard.
The mean sensitivity and positive predictive value for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma were 76% and 69% on 2.5-mm images, 73% and 69% on 5-mm images, and 67% and 76% on 7.5-mm images, respectively. No significant difference in sensitivity among the images was detected, except by one observer who reported a significant difference in the sensitivity between 2.5- and 7.5-mm images (p < 0.05) and between 5- and 7.5-mm images (p < 0.05). The mean A(z) values were 0.79, 0.80, and 0.78 for 2.5-, 5-, and 7.5-mm images, respectively. No significant difference in A(z) values among the images obtained with different slice thicknesses was detected.
For multidetector CT identification of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma, we found little or no advantage in reducing slice thickness to less than 5 mm.
本研究的目的是评估不同层厚对多排螺旋CT检测富血供肝细胞癌的诊断影响,以优化其检测效果。
本研究回顾性纳入了43例患有87个富血供肝细胞癌(直径范围为3 - 80 mm,平均22 mm)的患者,以及19例患有慢性肝炎或肝硬化且无肝细胞癌的患者,这些患者均接受了多排螺旋CT对全肝的动脉早期和动脉晚期成像。探测器排配置为2.5×4 mm,螺距为6,每个期相扫描时间为10.5秒。所有患者均以5 mL/秒的速率接受对比剂(2 mL/kg体重);动脉早期的平均扫描延迟为19.0秒,动脉晚期的平均延迟为34.5秒。每个期相分别获得80幅2.5 mm厚的重建图像、40幅5 mm厚的重建图像和26幅7.5 mm厚的重建图像。每个图像集由三名观察者分别解读,通过在工作站监视器上查看图像来检测富血供肝细胞癌。计算敏感度、阳性预测值和受试者操作特征曲线下面积(A(z))。我们将回顾性的良好随访以及影像学或病理证据作为金标准。
2.5 mm图像上富血供肝细胞癌的平均敏感度和阳性预测值分别为76%和69%,5 mm图像上分别为73%和69%,7.5 mm图像上分别为67%和76%。除一名观察者报告2.5 mm与7.5 mm图像之间(p < 0.05)以及5 mm与7.5 mm图像之间(p < 0.05)的敏感度存在显著差异外,各图像间敏感度未检测到显著差异。2.5 mm、5 mm和7.5 mm图像的平均A(z)值分别为0.79、0.80和0.78。不同层厚获得的图像间A(z)值未检测到显著差异。
对于多排螺旋CT识别富血供肝细胞癌,我们发现将层厚减小至小于5 mm几乎没有优势或根本没有优势。