Dawson T L
Graduate School of Education, Tolman Hall, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
J Appl Meas. 2000;1(4):346-71.
In a longitudinal/cross sectional study of moral and evaluative reasoning, Armon interviewed 23 females and 19 males, ages ranging from 5 at the first test time (1977) to 86 at the 4th (1989) test-time. Rasch analysis of Armon's data demonstrated that Armon's and Kohlberg's measures tap a single underlying dimension of reasoning; that individual stages across five items measure the same levels of reasoning, and that development on all items progresses at about the same rate. Participants found it easier to apply already available reasoning structures to new areas than to reason at a new stage, implying that stage transition is step-like.
在一项关于道德与评价性推理的纵向/横断面研究中,阿尔蒙采访了23名女性和19名男性,年龄跨度从首次测试时(1977年)的5岁到第四次测试时(1989年)的86岁。对阿尔蒙的数据进行的拉施分析表明,阿尔蒙和科尔伯格的测量方法挖掘出了推理的单一潜在维度;五个项目中的各个阶段测量的是相同水平的推理,并且所有项目上的发展速度大致相同。参与者发现,将已有的推理结构应用于新领域比在新阶段进行推理更容易,这意味着阶段转换是呈阶梯状的。