Eisenberg N, Carlo G, Murphy B, Van Court P
Arizona State University, Tempe 85287, USA.
Child Dev. 1995 Aug;66(4):1179-97.
Change in prosocial moral reasoning over 15 years, gender differences in prosocial reasoning, and the interrelations of moral reasoning, prosocial behavior, and empathy-related emotional responses were examined with longitudinal data from 17-18- and 19-20-year-olds and data from adolescents interviewed for the first time. Hedonistic reasoning declined in use until adolescence, and then increased somewhat in early adulthood. Needs-oriented and stereotypic reasoning increased until mid-childhood or early adolescence and then declined in use. Direct reciprocity and approval reasoning, which appeared to be on the decline in mid-adolescence in previous follow-ups, showed no decline into early adulthood. Several modes of higher-level reasoning increased in use across adolescence and early adulthood. Females' overall reasoning was higher than males'. Scores on interview and objective measures of prosocial moral reasoning were positively correlated. Consistent with expectations, there was some evidence of relations among prosocial reasoning, prosocial behavior, sympathy, and perspective taking.
通过对17 - 18岁和19 - 20岁人群的纵向数据以及首次接受访谈的青少年数据,研究了15年来亲社会道德推理的变化、亲社会推理中的性别差异,以及道德推理、亲社会行为和与同理心相关的情绪反应之间的相互关系。享乐主义推理在青少年期之前使用频率下降,然后在成年早期有所增加。以需求为导向和刻板的推理在童年中期或青少年早期之前增加,然后使用频率下降。在之前的随访中,直接互惠和认可推理在青少年中期似乎呈下降趋势,但在成年早期并未下降。几种更高层次推理模式在青少年期和成年早期的使用频率增加。女性的整体推理高于男性。亲社会道德推理访谈得分与客观测量得分呈正相关。与预期一致,有证据表明亲社会推理、亲社会行为、同情和观点采择之间存在一定关系。