Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死发病时出现Ⅲ级缺血提示坏死进展迅速,溶栓治疗后心肌挽救较少。

Grade III ischemia on presentation with acute myocardial infarction predicts rapid progression of necrosis and less myocardial salvage with thrombolysis.

作者信息

Birnbaum Yochai, Mahaffey Kenneth W, Criger Douglas A, Gates Kathy B, Barbash Gabriel I, Barbagelata Alejandro, Clemmensen Peter, Sgarbossa Elena B, Gibbons Raymond J, Rahman M Atiar, Califf Robert M, Granger Chistopher B, Wagner Galen S

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Tex. 77555-0553, USA.

出版信息

Cardiology. 2002;97(3):166-74. doi: 10.1159/000063334.

Abstract

We assessed the relation between baseline electrocardiographic ischemia grades and initial myocardial area at risk (AR) and final infarct size (IS) in 49 patients who had undergone (99m)Tc sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography before and 6 +/- 1 days after thrombolysis. Patients were classed as having grade III ischemia (ST segment elevation with terminal QRS distortion, n = 19) or grade II ischemia (ST elevation but no terminal QRS distortion, n = 30). We compared AR and IS by baseline ischemia grade and treatment (adenosine vs. placebo) and assessed relations of infarction index (IS/AR ratio x100) to time to thrombolysis, baseline ischemia grade, and adenosine therapy. Time to thrombolysis was similar for grade II and grade III. For placebo- treated patients, the median AR did not differ significantly between grade II (38%) and grade III patients (46%, p = 0.47), nor did median IS (16 vs. 40%, p = 0.096), but the median infarction index was 66 vs. 90% (p = 0.006). For adenosine-treated patients, median AR (21 vs. 26%, p = 0.44), median IS (5 vs. 17%, p = 0.15), and their ratio (31 vs. 67%, p = 0.23) did not differ significantly between grade II and grade III patients. The infarction index independently related to grade III ischemia (p = 0.0121) and adenosine therapy (p = 0.045). Infarct size related to baseline ischemia grade and was reduced by adenosine treatment. Necrosis progressed slowlier with baseline grade II versus III ischemia, which could offer more time for myocardial salvage with reperfusion.

摘要

我们评估了49例患者基线心电图缺血分级与初始心肌梗死危险区(AR)和最终梗死面积(IS)之间的关系,这些患者在溶栓前及溶栓后6±1天接受了(99m)Tc司他米比单光子发射计算机断层扫描。患者被分为III级缺血(ST段抬高伴终末QRS波变形,n = 19)或II级缺血(ST段抬高但无终末QRS波变形,n = 30)。我们根据基线缺血分级和治疗(腺苷与安慰剂)比较了AR和IS,并评估了梗死指数(IS/AR比值×100)与溶栓时间、基线缺血分级和腺苷治疗的关系。II级和III级患者的溶栓时间相似。对于接受安慰剂治疗的患者,II级患者(38%)和III级患者(46%,p = 0.47)的中位AR无显著差异,中位IS也无显著差异(分别为16%和40%,p = 0.096),但中位梗死指数分别为66%和90%(p = 0.006)。对于接受腺苷治疗的患者,II级和III级患者的中位AR(分别为21%和26%,p = 0.44)、中位IS(分别为5%和17%,p = 0.15)及其比值(分别为31%和67%,p = 0.23)无显著差异。梗死指数与III级缺血(p = 0.0121)和腺苷治疗(p = 0.045)独立相关。梗死面积与基线缺血分级有关,腺苷治疗可使其减小。与基线III级缺血相比,II级缺血时坏死进展较慢,这可能为再灌注挽救心肌提供更多时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验