Suppr超能文献

Panic disorder and the Defence Mechanism Test.

作者信息

Bogren Lennart, Bogren Inga-Britt, Ohrt Torbjörn, Sjödin Ingemar

机构信息

Division of Psychiatry, University Hospital, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Nord J Psychiatry. 2002;56(3):195-9. doi: 10.1080/080394802317607174.

Abstract

The aim was to study defence categories according to the modified version of the Defence Mechanism Test (DMTm) and to see if there was a relationship between DMTm and severity of illness. The material consists of 23 patients with panic disorder according to DSM-III-R who participated in a long-term follow-up of two clinical trials. The most common defence categories were repression, denial, disavowal or denial of the threat relation or of the identity of the peripheral person. The patients with denial or polymorphous identification had more severe symptoms and the latter group also were more handicapped by their symptoms. Denial and disavowal or denial of the threat relation may be defence categories, which are not so effective in preventing the individual from experiencing anxiety. Polymorphous identification, although not so common, does not seem to be an appropriate defence among patients with panic disorder.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验