Luzzatti Claudio, Raggi Rossella, Zonca Giusy, Pistarini Caterina, Contardi Antonella, Pinna Gian-Domenico
University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Brain Lang. 2002 Apr-Jun;81(1-3):432-44. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2536.
Neurolinguistic studies have provided important evidence regarding the organization of lexical representations and the structure of underlying conceptual knowledge; in particular, it has been shown that the retrieval of verbs and nouns can be damaged selectively. Dissociated lexical damage is proof of an independent mental organization of lexical representations and/or of the underlying processes. The aim of the present study is to estimate the rate of dissociated impairments for nouns and verbs on a large sample of mild to moderate aphasic patients and to investigate the mechanisms underlying such phenomena. In addition, the authors wished to verify to what degree the impairment for nouns and verbs is related to a specific type of language disorder. A confrontation naming task for verbs and nouns was administered to 58 aphasic patients. The major lexical (word frequency and age of acquisition) and semantic variables (familiarity and imageability of the underlying concept) were considered for each noun and verb used in the task. Verbs were distinguished by major functional classes (transitive, intransitive, and ergative verbs). The data collected from this task were analyzed twice: (i) as a group study comparison of major aphasic subgroups and (ii) as a multiple single case study to evaluate the differences on the naming of verbs and nouns and the effect of the lexical semantic variables on each individual patient. The results confirm the existence of dissociated naming impairments of verbs and nouns. Selective impairment of verbs is more frequent (34%) than that of nouns (10%). In many cases, the dissociated pattern of naming impairment disappeared when the effect of the concomitant variables (word frequency and imageability) was removed, but in approximately one-fifth of the cases the noun or verb superiority was preserved. Noun superiority emerged in five of six agrammatic patients. Both the naming of verbs (n = 9) or of nouns (n = 6) could be impaired selectively in fluent aphasic patients. The results lend support to the hypothesis of an independent mental organization of nouns and verbs, but a substantial effect of imageability and word frequency suggests an interaction of the naming impairment with underlying lexical and semantic aspects.
神经语言学研究为词汇表征的组织和潜在概念知识的结构提供了重要证据;特别是,研究表明动词和名词的检索可能会被选择性地破坏。分离性词汇损伤证明了词汇表征和/或潜在过程的独立心理组织。本研究的目的是在大量轻度至中度失语症患者样本中估计名词和动词的分离性损伤率,并研究此类现象背后的机制。此外,作者希望验证名词和动词的损伤在多大程度上与特定类型的语言障碍相关。对58名失语症患者进行了动词和名词的对答命名任务。对于任务中使用的每个名词和动词,都考虑了主要的词汇变量(词频和习得年龄)和语义变量(潜在概念的熟悉度和可想象性)。动词按主要功能类别(及物动词、不及物动词和作格动词)区分。从该任务收集的数据进行了两次分析:(i)作为主要失语症亚组的群体研究比较,(ii)作为多个单病例研究,以评估动词和名词命名的差异以及词汇语义变量对每个个体患者的影响。结果证实了动词和名词存在分离性命名损伤。动词的选择性损伤比名词(10%)更频繁(34%)。在许多情况下,当去除伴随变量(词频和可想象性)的影响时,命名损伤的分离模式消失,但在大约五分之一的情况下,名词或动词优势得以保留。六名语法缺失患者中有五名出现了名词优势。在流利型失语症患者中,动词(n = 9)或名词(n = 6)的命名都可能被选择性地损害。结果支持了名词和动词独立心理组织的假设,但可想象性和词频的显著影响表明命名损伤与潜在的词汇和语义方面存在相互作用。