Green Ronald M
Dartmouth College, USA.
Am J Bioeth. 2002 Winter;2(1):20-30. doi: 10.1162/152651602317267790.
In this chapter, I review some of the background thinking concerning matters of moral status that I had developed in previous years and that I would now bring to the work of the Human Embryo Research Panel. Two ideas were at the forefront of my thinking. First, that biology usually offers not decisive "events" but only continuous processes of development. Second, in making status determinations we do not so much "identify" a point on a developmental continuum where moral respect should be accorded as "choose" that point. These choices are "balancing decisions" in which the community of moral agents weighs its interests in protecting an entity against the burdens of doing so. After illustrating these two contentions, I consider some of the reasons why thinkers on the "right" and "left" of our bioethics debates have resisted or missed this basic insight.
在本章中,我回顾了一些我在前几年形成的关于道德地位问题的背景性思考,这些思考我现在将应用于人类胚胎研究小组的工作中。我的思考主要集中在两个观点上。其一,生物学通常提供的不是决定性的“事件”,而是持续的发育过程。其二,在确定地位时,与其说我们是“识别”发育连续体上应给予道德尊重的某个点,不如说是“选择”那个点。这些选择是“平衡决策”,在其中道德主体群体权衡其保护某个实体的利益与这样做所带来的负担。在阐述了这两个论点之后,我思考了一些原因,即为何在我们生物伦理学辩论中处于“右派”和“左派”的思想家们抵制或忽略了这一基本见解。