Suppr超能文献

商业益生菌菌株的种属特异性鉴定。

Species-specific identification of commercial probiotic strains.

作者信息

Yeung P S M, Sanders M E, Kitts C L, Cano R, Tong P S

机构信息

Dairy Products Technology Center, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 93407, USA.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2002 May;85(5):1039-51. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74164-7.

Abstract

Products containing probiotic bacteria are gaining popularity, increasing the importance of their accurate speciation. Unfortunately, studies have suggested that improper labeling of probiotic species is common in commercial products. Species identification of a bank of commercial probiotic strains was attempted using partial 16S rDNA sequencing, carbohydrate fermentation analysis, and cellular fatty acid methyl ester analysis. Results from partial 16S rDNA sequencing indicated discrepancies between species designations for 26 out of 58 strains tested, including two ATCC Lactobacillus strains. When considering only the commercial strains obtained directly from the manufacturers, 14 of 29 strains carried species designations different from those obtained by partial 16S rDNA sequencing. Strains from six commercial products were species not listed on the label. The discrepancies mainly occurred in Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei groups. Carbohydrate fermentation analysis was not sensitive enough to identify species within the L. acidophilus group. Fatty acid methyl ester analysis was found to be variable and inaccurate and is not recommended to identify probiotic lactobacilli.

摘要

含有益生菌的产品越来越受欢迎,这使得准确鉴定其菌种的重要性日益增加。不幸的是,研究表明,商业产品中益生菌菌种的错误标注很常见。我们尝试使用部分16S rDNA测序、碳水化合物发酵分析和细胞脂肪酸甲酯分析对一批商业益生菌菌株进行菌种鉴定。部分16S rDNA测序结果表明,在测试的58株菌株中,有26株的菌种命名存在差异,其中包括两株美国典型培养物保藏中心(ATCC)的乳酸杆菌菌株。仅考虑直接从制造商处获得的商业菌株时,29株中有14株的菌种命名与通过部分16S rDNA测序获得的结果不同。来自六种商业产品的菌株属于标签上未列出的菌种。差异主要发生在嗜酸乳杆菌和干酪乳杆菌组中。碳水化合物发酵分析对于嗜酸乳杆菌组内的菌种鉴定不够敏感。脂肪酸甲酯分析结果不稳定且不准确,不建议用于鉴定益生菌乳酸杆菌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验