Lubiatowski Przemyslaw, Gurunluoglu Raffi, Goldman Corey K, Skugor Blaazenka, Carnevale Kevin, Siemionow Maria
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jul;110(1):149-59. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200207000-00026.
An experimental study was conducted to investigate the potential use of intravascular gene therapy with adenovirus-mediated (Ad) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) for the enhancement of muscle flap perfusion and to evaluate the effect of therapy on microcirculatory hemodynamics and microvascular permeability in vivo by using a cremaster muscle flap model in the rat. The cremaster tube flap was left intact after isolation of the pudo-epigastric pedicle. A total of 90 male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five groups of 18 each, according to the type of intraarterial treatment. Control flaps received phosphate-buffered saline. Group 2 (the control gene encoding green fluorescent protein, Ad-GFP) served as the adenovirus control. In Groups 3, 4, and 5, flaps were pretreated with Ad-VEGF, Ad-Ang-1, and Ad-Ang-1 + Ad-VEGF, respectively. Flaps were preserved in a subcutaneous pocket in the hindlimb for evaluation of functional capillary density and microvascular permeability indices at 3, 7, and 14 days by intravital microscopy system. At day 7 and 14, Ad-VEGF, Ad-Ang-1, and combined treatment groups showed significantly higher numbers of capillary densities when compared with control and Ad-GFP groups (p < 0.05). At day 14, Ad-VEGF was the superior treatment group compared with Ad-Ang-1 and Ad-VEGF + Ad-Ang-1 (p < 0.05). Overall, there was a linear increase in the number of functional capillaries in all treatment groups (p < 0.05). At day 3 after Ad-Ang-1 therapy, a significantly lower permeability index was found when compared with Ad-VEGF + Ad-Ang-1 and Ad-VEGF alone treatment (p < 0.05). At day 7, the Ad-VEGF group had the highest score of permeability index compared with control, combined, and Ad-Ang-1 groups (p < 0.05). Histologic evaluation of muscle flaps demonstrated mild focal inflammation. There was evidence of mild vasculitis in all flaps except control muscles. Intravascular angiogenic therapy with Ad-VEGF or Ad-Ang-1 was technically feasible, as demonstrated by expression of the control gene, GFP, along the vascular tree. All treatment groups increased perfusion of the muscle flap over a period of 14 days, indicating a long-lasting effect of gene therapy. Ang-1 alone or in combination with VEGF was as effective as VEGF alone in augmenting muscle perfusion with more stable vessels 1 week after gene therapy.
进行了一项实验研究,以探讨腺病毒介导(Ad)的血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)或血管生成素-1(Ang-1)的血管内基因治疗在增强肌皮瓣灌注方面的潜在用途,并通过使用大鼠提睾肌皮瓣模型来评估该治疗对体内微循环血流动力学和微血管通透性的影响。在分离耻骨上腹壁蒂后,提睾肌皮瓣保持完整。根据动脉内治疗类型,将总共90只雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠分为五组,每组18只。对照皮瓣接受磷酸盐缓冲盐水。第2组(编码绿色荧光蛋白的对照基因,Ad-GFP)作为腺病毒对照。在第3、4和5组中,皮瓣分别用Ad-VEGF、Ad-Ang-1和Ad-Ang-1 + Ad-VEGF进行预处理。通过活体显微镜系统在第3、7和14天评估皮瓣在大鼠后肢皮下袋中的功能毛细血管密度和微血管通透性指数。在第7天和14天,与对照和Ad-GFP组相比,Ad-VEGF、Ad-Ang-1和联合治疗组的毛细血管密度显著更高(p < 0.05)。在第14天,与Ad-Ang-1和Ad-VEGF + Ad-Ang-1相比,Ad-VEGF是更优的治疗组(p < 0.05)。总体而言,所有治疗组的功能性毛细血管数量呈线性增加(p < 0.05)。在Ad-Ang-1治疗后第3天,与Ad-VEGF + Ad-Ang-1和单独Ad-VEGF治疗相比,通透性指数显著更低(p < 0.05)。在第7天,与对照、联合和Ad-Ang-1组相比,Ad-VEGF组的通透性指数得分最高(p < 0.05)。肌皮瓣的组织学评估显示有轻度局灶性炎症。除对照肌肉外,所有皮瓣均有轻度血管炎的证据。如对照基因GFP沿血管树的表达所示,用Ad-VEGF或Ad-Ang-1进行血管内血管生成治疗在技术上是可行的。所有治疗组在14天内均增加了肌皮瓣的灌注,表明基因治疗具有持久效果。在基因治疗1周后,单独使用Ang-1或与VEGF联合使用在增加肌肉灌注方面与单独使用VEGF一样有效,且血管更稳定。