Udry J Richard, Chantala Kim
Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516-2524, USA.
J Adolesc Health. 2002 Jul;31(1):84-92. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(02)00374-9.
To compare the risk status on health and behavior for those with same-sex partners and those without.
Add Health data provide a sample of 20,745 adolescents in grades 7 through 12 interviewed at home. The risk statuses of respondents with no partners, same-sex-only partners, and partners of both sexes were compared to respondents with opposite-sex partners only. Respondents were evaluated on selected personal and social attributes (verbal IQ, family structure, masculinity, popularity), and risk status (substance use, depression, suicidal thoughts, anal sex, general delinquency, being physically attacked, perceived risk of being killed or getting AIDS). Data were analyzed by logistic and linear regression using STATA to adjust for clustering and sampling weights.
Compared to boys with opposite-sex-only partners, boys with same-sex-only partners were at high risk for emotional problems, but not delinquency or substance use. Boys with partners of both sexes were at high risk for delinquency and substance use, but not for emotional problems. Neither group of boys with same-sex partners is at high risk of being attacked compared to those with opposite-sex partners only. Girls with only same-sex partners are never a high-risk group, while girls with partners of both sexes are the high-risk category in every case.
Adolescents with same-sex-only partners do not resemble those with partners of both sexes in risk status. Combining the two categories obscures the unique risk profile of those with both-sex partners, and obscures the low risk on most variables but the high emotional risk of boys with only same-sex partners.
比较有同性伴侣者和没有同性伴侣者的健康及行为风险状况。
“青少年健康纵向研究”数据提供了一个由20745名7至12年级青少年组成的样本，这些青少年是在家中接受访谈的。将没有伴侣者、只有同性伴侣者以及有两性伴侣者的风险状况与只有异性伴侣的受访者进行比较。对受访者的选定个人和社会属性（言语智商、家庭结构、男子气概、受欢迎程度）以及风险状况（物质使用、抑郁、自杀念头、肛交、一般犯罪行为、遭受身体攻击、感知到的被杀或感染艾滋病风险）进行评估。使用STATA通过逻辑回归和线性回归分析数据，以调整聚类和抽样权重。
与只有异性伴侣的男孩相比，只有同性伴侣的男孩存在情绪问题的风险较高，但犯罪行为或物质使用风险不高。有两性伴侣的男孩存在犯罪行为和物质使用的风险较高，但不存在情绪问题风险。与只有异性伴侣的男孩相比，两组有同性伴侣的男孩遭受攻击的风险都不高。只有同性伴侣的女孩从未属于高风险群体，而有两性伴侣的女孩在每种情况下都是高风险类别。
只有同性伴侣的青少年在风险状况方面与有两性伴侣的青少年不同。将这两类合并会掩盖有两性伴侣者独特的风险概况，也会掩盖只有同性伴侣的男孩在大多数变量上的低风险但高情绪风险。
