Baghdadli A, Gonnier V, Aussilloux C
Praticien Hospitalier, Centre de Ressources Autisme, SMPEA Peyre Plantade, CHU de Montpellier, 291, avenue du Doyen Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5.
Encephale. 2002 May-Jun;28(3 Pt 1):248-54.
Autism is an early developmental disorder. It leads to severe and durable disturbances. Given this problem, no treatment can be excluded a priori. Thus, many approaches are used to deal with autistic disorders. In France, pharmacological treatments are, for instance, largely and mostly used in adults. In the USA, these treatments concern 50% of persons with autism of any age. Nevertheless, they are rarely based on controlled studies. At the present, however, prescriptions and expected effects appear to be hard to localize. Furthermore, only few controlled studies validate their use. Aim - We offer a review of studies about medical treatments used in adolescents and adults with autism. They are classified in 3 categories: the first (category I) includes drugs used for their neurochemical effects focusing on autistic signs. The second (category II) covers drugs used for treatment of behavioural disorders frequently associated with autism. The third (category III) corresponds to a wide range of drugs or vitamins for wich only few case studies exist reporting irregular positive effects. The main hypothesis of this review is that autism involves a dysfunction of the neuromediation systems. This hypothesis opens new perspectives in the research of medical treatments in autism by focusing on molecules, which are supposed to have an effect on neuromediation systems. Method - Our review is based on studies, which have been published during the past twenty years. For many studies, data are limited to adolescents and adults. So we expanded our review to data available in children. The data bases that we have used are medline and psyclit. Keywords have been chosen according to: pharmacological considerations (psychotropic, psychoactive drugs, psychopharmacology) and clinical symptoms (autism, automutilations, aggressive behavior, and hyperactivity). Hypothesis of a dysfunction in the neuromediation systems in autism - Many studies exist about biochemical abnormalities in autism. As in schizophrenia and mental retardation, dysfunctions of the neuromediation systems are considered to be etiological factors. In 30% of people with autism the most regular dysfunction is the increase of serotonine. This led to the serotoninergic hypothesis in autism and to the use of active drugs in the serotonine system. However, the presence of other neurometabolic abnormalities also motivates the use of drugs, supposed to be active in other neuromediation systems. Pharmacological treatments in autism - Category I section sign 1 Active drugs in the dopamine system. Haloperidol (Dopamine antagonist): The effects of this molecule have been broadly studied in autism. Results indicate high efficiency in some symptoms of autism (lack in social behaviour, stereotypical behaviour) and in behavioural impairments that may be associated with autism (aggressive behaviour, hyperactivity). Its side effects, particulary the risk of late dyskinesy, make atypical antipsychotics preferable because of their lower risks. Risperidone (Dopamine and serotonine antagonist): Among several studies only few have been controlled. They indicate that Risperidone has positive effects on the behaviour and is quite well tolerated. section sign 2 Active drugs in the serotonine system. Clomipramine: after promising results, the medium-term efficiency has decreased and severe side effects have limited its use. Fluvoxamine, Fluoxétine, Sertraline (Specific serotonine drugs): Their efficiency has been mainly tested through open studies and their results are contrasted. In some cases, social behaviours have improved and aggressiveness and stereotyped behaviours have decreased. Fenfluramine: At present, this drug is removed from the market. Yet, some studies have suggested that it improves behavioural disturbances as well as performances in autism. section sign 3 Active drugs in the opiate system. Naltrexone: Several controlled studies have indicated an improvement in social and aggressive behaviours. Nevertheless, these studies have used small size sample and have not been replicated. Category II. This category correspond to drugs supposed to be active on neurochemical disturbances found in autism but their target symptoms are not autism specific signs as defined by the ICD 10. Buspirone: This serotonine agonist may have a good impact on emotional disorders and sleeping confusions. Methylphenidate: Most of the current studies about this noradrenergic drug concern children. The results are variable. Paradoxical effects may exist in children with severe mental retardation. Propanolol: Some isolated studies habe reported its efficiency on behavioural disturbances. Clonidine: This adrenergic drug treats efficiently some cases of aggressive behaviour and hyperactivity. Category III. This category contains a wide range of drugs, vitamins or method used in autism after sporadic observations of their positive effects. Secretine: An important improvement has been reported in isolated cases. However, controlled studies in children do not confirm these results. Vitamines B6, B12 and Magnesium: An improvement in socialization and in behavioural disorders have been reported in some cases, but these results are not yet confirmed. Lithium, Carbamazépine, Valproate: Results of some case studies have found it to be efficient in cyclic disorders. Gluten and casein free diet: An improvement of social behaviour have been reported by some parents after these diets. No controlled study has validated this observation. Conclusion - There is no consensus on the use of psychopharmacological treatments in autism. Although there exist many clinical observations, only few controlled studies have validated the efficiency and safety of these treatments. At the present time and until having sufficient studies, drugs are generally limited to severe disorders, for which usual psycho-educational approaches are insufficient.
自闭症是一种早期发育障碍。它会导致严重且持久的功能紊乱。鉴于此问题,没有哪种治疗方法可以被先验地排除。因此,人们采用了许多方法来应对自闭症谱系障碍。在法国,例如,药物治疗在很大程度上且主要用于成年人。在美国,这些治疗涉及50%的各年龄段自闭症患者。然而,它们很少基于对照研究。目前,处方和预期效果似乎难以确定。此外,只有少数对照研究证实了它们的有效性。目的——我们对用于青少年和成年自闭症患者的医学治疗研究进行综述。这些研究分为三类:第一类(I类)包括因其神经化学作用而用于针对自闭症症状的药物。第二类(II类)涵盖用于治疗常与自闭症相关的行为障碍的药物。第三类(III类)对应于仅有少数病例研究报告有不规则积极效果的广泛药物或维生素。本综述的主要假设是自闭症涉及神经调节系统功能障碍。这一假设通过关注那些被认为对神经调节系统有作用的分子,为自闭症医学治疗研究开辟了新的视角。方法——我们的综述基于过去二十年发表的研究。对于许多研究,数据仅限于青少年和成年人。所以我们将综述范围扩大到儿童可用的数据。我们使用的数据库是Medline和Psyclit。关键词是根据以下内容选择的:药理学考量(精神药物、精神活性药物、精神药理学)和临床症状(自闭症、自伤行为、攻击行为和多动)。自闭症中神经调节系统功能障碍的假设——关于自闭症中生化异常的研究有很多。与精神分裂症和智力障碍一样,神经调节系统功能障碍被认为是病因。在30%的自闭症患者中,最常见的功能障碍是血清素增加。这导致了自闭症中的血清素能假说以及血清素系统中活性药物的使用。然而,其他神经代谢异常的存在也促使人们使用那些被认为在其他神经调节系统中有活性的药物。自闭症的药物治疗——I类部分符号1多巴胺系统中的活性药物。氟哌啶醇(多巴胺拮抗剂):该分子在自闭症中的作用已得到广泛研究。结果表明,它对自闭症的某些症状(社交行为缺陷、刻板行为)以及可能与自闭症相关的行为障碍(攻击行为、多动)有高效作用。其副作用,特别是迟发性运动障碍的风险,使得非典型抗精神病药物因其较低风险而更受青睐。利培酮(多巴胺和血清素拮抗剂):在多项研究中,只有少数是对照研究。这些研究表明利培酮对行为有积极作用且耐受性良好。部分符号2血清素系统中的活性药物。氯米帕明:在取得有前景的结果后,中期疗效下降,严重副作用限制了其使用。氟伏沙明、氟西汀、舍曲林(特异性血清素药物):它们的疗效主要通过开放性研究进行测试,结果存在差异。在某些情况下,社交行为有所改善,攻击性和刻板行为减少。芬氟拉明:目前,该药物已退市。然而,一些研究表明它能改善自闭症中的行为障碍以及表现。部分符号3阿片系统中的活性药物。纳曲酮:多项对照研究表明社交和攻击行为有所改善。然而,这些研究样本量较小且未被重复验证。II类。此类对应于那些被认为对自闭症中发现的神经化学紊乱有活性但其目标症状并非ICD - 10所定义的自闭症特异性症状的药物。丁螺环酮:这种血清素激动剂可能对情绪障碍和睡眠紊乱有良好影响。哌甲酯:目前关于这种去甲肾上腺素能药物的大多数研究针对儿童。结果各不相同。重度智力障碍儿童可能存在矛盾效应。普萘洛尔:一些孤立研究报告了其对行为障碍的疗效。可乐定:这种肾上腺素能药物有效治疗某些攻击行为和多动病例。III类。此类包含在对其积极效果进行零星观察后用于自闭症的广泛药物、维生素或方法。促胰液素:个别病例报告有显著改善。然而,儿童对照研究未证实这些结果。维生素B6、B12和镁:在某些情况下报告了社交和行为障碍有所改善,但这些结果尚未得到证实。锂盐、卡马西平、丙戊酸盐:一些病例研究结果发现它们对周期性障碍有效。无麸质和无酪蛋白饮食:一些家长报告这些饮食后社交行为有所改善。没有对照研究证实这一观察结果。结论——在自闭症的精神药物治疗使用上没有共识。尽管有许多临床观察,但只有少数对照研究证实了这些治疗的有效性和安全性。目前,在有足够研究之前,药物通常仅限于严重障碍,对于这些障碍,常规的心理教育方法并不足够。