Suppr超能文献

[上消化道出血内镜诊断的效率标准]

[Efficiency criteria for endoscopic diagnostic in upper gastrointestinal bleeding].

作者信息

Dimofte G, Isloi A, Grigoraş I, Diaconescu V

机构信息

Clinica I Chirurgie, Facultatea de Medicină, Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie Gr. T. Popa Iaşi.

出版信息

Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2001 Jul-Sep;105(3):527-32.

Abstract

Endoscopy plays a major role in the evaluation of upper digestive haemorrhage. We evaluate the difficulties in the introduction of emergency endoscopy in a period of transition, regarding mentalities and errors generated by the learning curve. The study includes 512 consecutive patients admitted with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. We retrospectively evaluate some proposed efficiency criteria for the diagnostic endoscopy: the frequency of incomplete endoscopic evaluation (14%), frequency and causes of endoscopic diagnostic errors (3%), frequency of upper digestive haemorrhages with no detectable source (24.2%) and the indication of multiple endoscopic examination. We discuss the causes responsible for the generation of such problems as well as the dynamics of those during the evaluated period.

摘要

内镜检查在上消化道出血的评估中起着重要作用。我们评估了在转型期引入急诊内镜检查时所面临的困难,涉及观念以及学习曲线所产生的失误。该研究纳入了512例连续收治的上消化道出血患者。我们回顾性评估了一些针对诊断性内镜检查提出的效率标准:内镜评估不完整的频率(14%)、内镜诊断错误的频率及原因(3%)、未检测到出血源的上消化道出血的频率(24.2%)以及多次内镜检查的指征。我们讨论了导致这些问题产生的原因以及在评估期间这些问题的动态变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验