Fulmer Terry
Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, Division of Nursing, New York University, USA.
Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2002;20:369-95.
Elder mistreatment (EM) is a serious and prevalent syndrome that is estimated to affect between 500,000 to 1.2 million older adults in the United States annually (Pillemer & Finkelhor, 1988). This chapter reviews both the state of the published science and limitations in the knowledge base on the topic. The literature for this review was obtained through computer-assisted searches of PubMed (878 citations), the Cumulative Index of Nursing Research (CINAHL) (593 citations) and Psych-Info databases (443 citations). The search terms used were elder mistreatment, elder neglect, elder abuse, or domestic abuse of the elderly. No limit was placed on the age of publications because of the relative scarcity of research on the subject. Nonnursing articles were included because there are so few nurse researchers addressing this topic. The age limit for subjects in these studies was 65 years and older. Studies were limited to those conducted in the United States, and descriptive studies were included as they form the majority of the research to date. Findings indicate that frail, very old (over 75 years), older adults who have a diagnosis of depression or dementia are more likely to be mistreated (Dyer, Pavlik, Murphy, & Hyman, 2000; Coyne, Reichman, & Berbig, 1993; Fulmer & Gurland, 1996; Lachs & Pillemer, 1995; Lachs et al., 1997; Lachs, Williams, O'Brien, Pillemer, & Charlson, 1998; Lachs & Fulmer, 1993; Lachs, Berkman, Fulmer, & Horwitz, 1994). Those older adults who required assistance with activities of daily living had poor social networks and were at higher risk for EM (Lachs & Pillemer, 1995; Lachs et al., 1997; Lachs et al., 1998; Lachs & Fulmer, 1993; Lachs et al., 1994). Neglect, as a subcategory of EM, accounts for the majority of cases (Fulmer, Paveza, Abraham, & Fairchild, 2000; Pavlik, Hyman, Festa, & Bitondo Dyer, 2001; Fulmer & Gurland, 1996). There is still debate regarding the role of minority status, abuse in childhood, and the persons most likely to mistreat older adults. There is a critical need for replication studies and new research on this important topic. Problems with measurement, funding challenges, and the paucity of investigators conducting research on EM have left the field with several unanswered questions and some conflicting findings. This chapter summarizes the interdisciplinary literature and makes recommendations for future nursing research programs.
老年人虐待(EM)是一种严重且普遍存在的综合征,据估计,美国每年有50万至120万老年人受到影响(皮勒默和芬克尔霍尔,1988年)。本章回顾了已发表的相关科学研究现状以及该主题知识库中的局限性。本综述的文献通过对PubMed(878条引文)、护理研究累积索引(CINAHL)(593条引文)和心理学文摘数据库(443条引文)进行计算机辅助检索获得。使用的检索词为老年人虐待、老年人忽视、老年人虐待或老年人家庭虐待。由于该主题的研究相对较少,因此对出版物的年份没有限制。纳入了非护理领域的文章,因为关注该主题的护理研究人员非常少。这些研究中受试者的年龄限制为65岁及以上。研究仅限于在美国进行的研究,并且纳入了描述性研究,因为它们构成了迄今为止研究的大部分。研究结果表明,身体虚弱、年龄很大(75岁以上)、被诊断患有抑郁症或痴呆症的老年人更容易受到虐待(戴尔、帕夫利克、墨菲和海曼,2000年;科因、赖克曼和贝尔比格,1993年;富尔默和古兰,1996年;拉克斯和皮勒默,1995年;拉克斯等人,1997年;拉克斯、威廉姆斯、奥布赖恩、皮勒默和查尔森,1998年;拉克斯和富尔默,1993年;拉克斯、伯克曼、富尔默和霍维茨,1994年)。那些在日常生活活动中需要帮助的老年人社交网络较差,遭受老年人虐待的风险更高(拉克斯和皮勒默,1995年;拉克斯等人,1997年;拉克斯等人,1998年;拉克斯和富尔默,1993年;拉克斯等人,1994年)。作为老年人虐待的一个子类别,忽视占大多数案例(富尔默、帕韦扎、亚伯拉罕和费尔柴尔德,2000年;帕夫利克、海曼、费斯塔和比托多·戴尔,2001年;富尔默和古兰,1996年)。关于少数族裔身份、童年虐待以及最有可能虐待老年人的人群的作用仍存在争议。迫切需要对这一重要主题进行重复研究和新的研究。测量问题、资金挑战以及从事老年人虐待研究的调查人员匮乏,使得该领域仍有几个未解决的问题和一些相互矛盾的研究结果。本章总结了跨学科文献,并对未来的护理研究项目提出了建议。