Hudson M F, Johnson T F
Annu Rev Gerontol Geriatr. 1986;6:81-134.
The 31 pioneering studies tell us that elder neglect and abuse occur in various forms and are often inflicted on older women by relatives who are in a caregiving role. Yet, the studies' findings are insufficient to document the prevalence or to identify the cause(s) of elder mistreatment. Given our concern about elders and their families, further research is needed, guided by consideration of some priority issues (Callahan, 1982). The first question is what is and is not elder mistreatment and by whose definition. Since one's professional orientation has a major impact on one's perceptions, will we see what we expect or fear we will see when confronted with a possible mistreatment situation? Is elder mistreatment a legal problem, a criminal act, or is it one symptom of our society's lack of preparation for the care of its old-old? Research needs to address ways our society can prepare itself (families and communities) to care for our increasing population of old-old citizens. Second, as researchers, practitioners, and policymakers, we need to be clear about our own motives and incentives for focusing on elder mistreatment. Are our behaviors self-serving or other-serving? How can we each most effectively help our elders and their families and thus prevent the occurrence of elder mistreatment? Third, we need public and professional education that provides accurate information about aging, elder care, community resources, and elder mistreatment-education that can correct or counterbalance the mass media's misleading accounts. A fourth issue is the need to respond to the existence of elder mistreatment in reasonable ways so that social benefits will not exceed social costs. Greater effort and money put into programs that provide alternative forms of elder care and that support and assist families providing elder care will be most cost effective (human and monetary) in the long run than will laws that inappropriately decrease family privacy and control. We need to direct our energies and interventions at the causes, rather than the symptoms, of elder mistreatment. Finally, given the existing data base on elder mistreatment and the access barriers, consideration should be given to determining which research designs would produce the most valid, reliable, and useful findings. Gaining understanding of elder mistreatment-its antecedents, causes, and consequences-is prerequisite to effective and efficient prevention, identification, and treatment.
这31项开创性研究告诉我们,老年人受忽视和虐待的形式多种多样,而且往往是由承担照料职责的亲属施加在老年女性身上的。然而,这些研究结果不足以记录虐待老年人行为的普遍程度,也无法确定其成因。鉴于我们对老年人及其家庭的关注,需要在考虑一些优先问题的指导下开展进一步研究(卡拉汉,1982年)。第一个问题是,什么是以及什么不是虐待老年人行为,以及由谁来定义。由于一个人的专业倾向会对其认知产生重大影响,那么当面对可能的虐待情况时,我们会看到我们所期望的,还是担心会看到的呢?虐待老年人行为是一个法律问题、刑事犯罪,还是我们社会在照顾高龄老人方面准备不足的一种表现?研究需要探讨我们的社会(家庭和社区)如何做好准备来照顾日益增多的高龄公民。其次,作为研究人员、从业者和政策制定者,我们需要明确自己关注虐待老年人行为的动机和诱因。我们的行为是为了自身利益还是为了他人利益?我们每个人如何才能最有效地帮助老年人及其家庭,从而预防虐待老年人行为的发生?第三,我们需要公众教育和专业教育,提供关于老龄化、老年护理、社区资源以及虐待老年人行为的准确信息——这种教育能够纠正或平衡大众媒体的误导性报道。第四个问题是,需要以合理的方式应对虐待老年人行为的存在,以使社会效益不超过社会成本。从长远来看,在提供替代形式的老年护理以及支持和协助提供老年护理的家庭的项目上投入更多努力和资金,在人力和财力方面将比不恰当地减少家庭隐私和控制权的法律更具成本效益。我们需要将精力和干预措施指向虐待老年人行为的成因,而非其表象。最后,鉴于现有的关于虐待老年人行为的数据库以及获取数据的障碍,应该考虑确定哪种研究设计能够产生最有效、可靠和有用的结果。了解虐待老年人行为——其前因、成因和后果——是有效且高效地预防、识别和治疗的先决条件。