• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cost effectiveness of paclitaxel/cisplatin compared with cyclophosphamide/cisplatin in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer in Belgium.

作者信息

Neymark Niels, Gorlia Thierry, Adriaenssen Ines, Baron Benoit, Piccart Martine

机构信息

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Data Center, Health Economics Unit, bte. 11, Avenue E. Mounier 83, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(7):485-97. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220070-00006.

DOI:10.2165/00019053-200220070-00006
PMID:12093304
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the economic impact of two polychemotherapy regimens for patients with advanced ovarian cancer from the perspective of the Belgian health insurance and financing system.

DESIGN

An economic evaluation was integrated in an intergroup randomised controlled trial (EORTC 55931) in which patients were randomised to receive the new treatment of paclitaxel and cisplatin or the standard therapy of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin. Data on the use of medical resources were collected prospectively for the 231 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) patients in the trial and costs were valued by using unit prices. The outcome for the economic evaluation was mean survival time as determined by the so-called restricted means method, with the time point of restriction fixed by statistical criteria. A correction of censoring of the cost data collected in the trial was also performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

The paclitaxel and cisplatin group experienced a statistically significant improvement in mean survival time of 4 months, which was associated with an increase in the average total cost per patient of 6795 euros (EUR; 1998 values), when costs were assessed over the same period as the gain in mean survival time. This corresponds to a point estimate of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR20 385 per life-year gained. The impact of uncertainty was assessed by using a bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap method with 5000 resamples, and the final results of the analysis are expressed in terms of a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.

CONCLUSIONS

The present economic evaluation has shown that the substitution of paclitaxel for cyclophosphamide in the chemotherapy regimen for women with advanced ovarian cancer leads to a significant improvement in patient survival, which is associated with an increase in costs for the Belgian health insurance system.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cost effectiveness of paclitaxel/cisplatin compared with cyclophosphamide/cisplatin in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer in Belgium.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(7):485-97. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220070-00006.
2
From randomised clinical trials to clinical practice : a pragmatic cost-effectiveness analysis of Paclitaxel in first-line therapy for advanced ovarian cancer.从随机临床试验到临床实践:紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌一线治疗的实用成本效益分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(10):633-41. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422100-00002.
3
Economic evaluation of three two-drug chemotherapy regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.三种两药联合化疗方案用于晚期非小细胞肺癌的经济学评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(11):1155-66. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523110-00007.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of paclitaxel and cisplatin versus cyclophosphamide and cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced ovarian cancer. A European perspective.
Eur J Cancer. 1998 Nov;34(12):1894-901. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00260-3.
5
Is paclitaxel and cisplatin a cost-effective first-line therapy for advance ovarian carcinoma?紫杉醇和顺铂作为晚期卵巢癌的一线治疗方案是否具有成本效益?
Cancer. 1996 May 15;77(10):2086-91. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960515)77:10<2086::AID-CNCR18>3.0.CO;2-R.
6
Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results.顺铂联合紫杉醇与顺铂联合环磷酰胺治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌女性的随机组间试验:三年结果
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 May 3;92(9):699-708. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.9.699.
7
Pharmacoeconomic profile of paclitaxel as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. A lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis.紫杉醇作为晚期卵巢癌患者一线治疗药物的药物经济学概况。一项终生成本效益分析。
Cancer. 1996 Dec 1;78(11):2366-73.
8
Pharmacoeconomic profile of taxanes in advanced ovarian cancer.紫杉烷类药物在晚期卵巢癌中的药物经济学概况
Anticancer Drugs. 1998 Nov;9(10):909-16. doi: 10.1097/00001813-199811000-00010.
9
Cost-utility analysis of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.紫杉醇联合顺铂治疗晚期卵巢癌患者的成本效用分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Sep;66(3):454-63. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4786.
10
Paclitaxel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of ovarian cancer.紫杉醇:对其用于治疗卵巢癌的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(12):1227-59. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119120-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of sequential paclitaxel-carboplatin followed by gemcitabine-based chemotherapy compared with paclitaxel-carboplatin therapy administered to patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A retrospective, STROBE-compliant study.晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者接受序贯紫杉醇-卡铂治疗后再接受吉西他滨为基础的化疗与紫杉醇-卡铂治疗的效果比较:一项符合STROBE标准的回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(51):e5696. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005696.
2
Cost Effectiveness of Chemotherapeutic Agents and Targeted Biologics in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.化疗药物和靶向生物制剂在卵巢癌中的成本效益:一项系统评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Nov;33(11):1155-85. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0304-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The standard error of an estimate of expectation of life, with special reference to expectation of tumourless life in experiments with mice.寿命预期估计值的标准误差,特别涉及小鼠实验中无瘤生存期的预期。
J Hyg (Lond). 1949 Jun;47(2):188. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400014443.
2
A Bayesian approach to aid in formulary decision making: incorporating institution-specific cost-effectiveness data with clinical trial results.一种有助于制定药品处方集决策的贝叶斯方法:将机构特定的成本效益数据与临床试验结果相结合。
Med Decis Making. 2003 May-Jun;23(3):252-64. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03023003007.
3
Healthcare resource utilisation and costs of treating NSAID-associated gastrointestinal toxicity. A multinational perspective.
Economic evaluation of three two-drug chemotherapy regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
三种两药联合化疗方案用于晚期非小细胞肺癌的经济学评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(11):1155-66. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523110-00007.
4
From randomised clinical trials to clinical practice : a pragmatic cost-effectiveness analysis of Paclitaxel in first-line therapy for advanced ovarian cancer.从随机临床试验到临床实践:紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌一线治疗的实用成本效益分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(10):633-41. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422100-00002.
非甾体抗炎药相关胃肠道毒性的医疗资源利用及治疗成本:多国视角
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19 Suppl 1:17-32. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119001-00002.
4
Patient management strategies and transplantation techniques in european stem cell transplantation centers offering breast cancer patients high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support: a joint report from the EORTC and EBMT.欧洲为乳腺癌患者提供高剂量化疗及外周血干细胞支持的干细胞移植中心的患者管理策略与移植技术:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)和欧洲血液与骨髓移植协会(EBMT)的联合报告
Haematologica. 2000 Jul;85(7):733-44.
5
Improved management of radiotherapy departments through accurate cost data.通过准确的成本数据改善放疗科管理。
Radiother Oncol. 2000 Jun;55(3):251-62. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00034-1.
6
Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results.顺铂联合紫杉醇与顺铂联合环磷酰胺治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌女性的随机组间试验:三年结果
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 May 3;92(9):699-708. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.9.699.
7
Confirmation of the "old" standard of care for ovarian cancer and a challenge.卵巢癌“旧”护理标准的确认与一项挑战。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 May 3;92(9):674-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.9.674.
8
The costs of managing patients with advanced colorectal cancer in 10 different European centres.欧洲10个不同中心管理晚期结直肠癌患者的费用。
Eur J Cancer. 1999 Dec;35(13):1789-95. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00216-6.
9
Estimating country-specific cost-effectiveness from multinational clinical trials.从跨国临床试验中估算特定国家的成本效益。
Health Econ. 1998 Sep;7(6):481-93. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199809)7:6<481::aid-hec353>3.0.co;2-k.
10
Cost-effectiveness of pravastatin in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: comparison between Belgium and the United States of a projected risk model.普伐他汀在冠心病二级预防中的成本效益:比利时与美国之间对一个预测风险模型的比较
Atherosclerosis. 1998 Apr;137 Suppl:S111-6. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(97)00321-3.