• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Xitact LS500腹腔镜模拟器的表面效度、专家效度和效标效度。

Face-, expert, and referent validity of the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

作者信息

Schijven M, Jakimowicz J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, PO box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2002 Dec;16(12):1764-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9229-9. Epub 2002 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-001-9229-9
PMID:12098029
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to establish face-, expert, and referent validity of the Xitact LS500; a virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy simulator.

METHODS

A four-page, 20-item structured questionnaire was presented to 120 surgeons attending a surgical convention. Participants received an instructed hands-on "tour" on the Xitact simulator. Data were analyzed according to the level of experience of the surgeon, resulting in an "expert group opinion" of 87 surgeons and a "referent group opinion" of 33 surgeons.

RESULTS

The majority of respondents believe Xitact has the potential to become a useful tool in teaching (93.1%) and measuring performance assessment (79.3%) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Expert- and referent-group opinion does not differ significantly on any of the presented statements. The opinion regarding the realism of the virtual laparoscopic cholecystectomy environment is favorable among both groups, although it is considered not yet perfect. The "haptic feedback" sensation of the Xitact is a parameter that needs further development.

CONCLUSIONS

Both expert- and referent surgeons value Xitact to be an important and useful tool in the laparoscopic teaching setting. Further studies need to be performed to establish the construct validity of the simulator (e.g., to what extent is the simulator logically encompassed into a theoretical framework of acquiring skills, needed for the laparoscopic cholecystectomy) to measure shortening of learning curves on the laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure, and ultimately to justify its use in the surgical curriculum.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确立Xitact LS500(一种虚拟现实腹腔镜胆囊切除术模拟器)的表面效度、专家效度和效标效度。

方法

向120名参加外科会议的外科医生发放了一份四页、共20项的结构化问卷。参与者接受了关于Xitact模拟器的实操指导“演示”。根据外科医生的经验水平对数据进行分析,得出87名外科医生的“专家组意见”和33名外科医生的“参照组意见”。

结果

大多数受访者认为Xitact有潜力成为腹腔镜胆囊切除术教学(93.1%)和评估操作表现(79.3%)的有用工具。在所有陈述方面,专家组和参照组的意见没有显著差异。两组对于虚拟腹腔镜胆囊切除术环境的真实感评价都较好,尽管认为其尚不完善。Xitact的“触觉反馈”感觉是一个需要进一步改进的参数。

结论

专家外科医生和参照外科医生都认为Xitact是腹腔镜教学环境中的重要且有用的工具。需要进一步开展研究以确立该模拟器的结构效度(例如,模拟器在多大程度上合理地纳入了腹腔镜胆囊切除术所需技能获取的理论框架),从而衡量腹腔镜胆囊切除术操作学习曲线的缩短情况,并最终证明其在外科课程中的应用合理性。

相似文献

1
Face-, expert, and referent validity of the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.Xitact LS500腹腔镜模拟器的表面效度、专家效度和效标效度。
Surg Endosc. 2002 Dec;16(12):1764-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9229-9. Epub 2002 Jul 8.
2
Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.结构效度:专家和新手在Xitact LS500腹腔镜模拟器上的操作表现。
Surg Endosc. 2003 May;17(5):803-10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9151-9. Epub 2003 Feb 17.
3
How to select aspirant laparoscopic surgical trainees: establishing concurrent validity comparing Xitact LS500 index performance scores with standardized psychomotor aptitude test battery scores.如何选拔有抱负的腹腔镜手术学员:通过比较Xitact LS500指数表现分数与标准化心理运动能力测试组合分数来建立同时效度。
J Surg Res. 2004 Sep;121(1):112-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.02.005.
4
Introducing the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator: toward a revolution in surgical education.推出Xitact LS500腹腔镜模拟器:迈向外科教育的一场革命。
Surg Technol Int. 2003;11:32-6.
5
Face validity study of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic suturing simulator.ProMIS增强现实腹腔镜缝合模拟器的表面效度研究
Surg Technol Int. 2008;17:26-32.
6
LapMentor metrics possess limited construct validity.LapMentor指标的结构效度有限。
Simul Healthc. 2008 Spring;3(1):16-25. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31816366b9.
7
Development of a virtual reality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术虚拟现实培训课程的开发。
Br J Surg. 2009 Sep;96(9):1086-93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6679.
8
Face, content and construct validation of the first virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator.虚拟现实腹腔镜肾切除术模拟器的面部、内容和结构验证。
BJU Int. 2010 Sep;106(6):850-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09193.x. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
9
ProMIS augmented reality training of laparoscopic procedures face validity.ProMIS腹腔镜手术增强现实训练的表面效度。
Simul Healthc. 2008 Summer;3(2):97-102. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181659e91.
10
Face and construct validity of virtual reality simulation of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.腹腔镜妇科手术虚拟现实模拟的表面效度和结构效度
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):540.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.12.030. Epub 2009 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishment of a urogynecology cadaver-based hands-on workshop.建立一个基于泌尿妇科尸体的实践工作坊。
Afr Health Sci. 2023 Mar;23(1):606-613. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i1.64.
2
Bimanual Fundamentals: Validation of a New Curriculum for Virtual Reality Training of Laparoscopic Skills.双手基础:虚拟现实腹腔镜技能培训新课程的验证。
Surg Innov. 2020 Oct;27(5):523-533. doi: 10.1177/1553350620953030. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
3
Use of a Low-Cost Portable 3D Virtual Reality Gesture-Mediated Simulator for Training and Learning Basic Psychomotor Skills in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Development and Content Validity Study.
使用低成本便携式 3D 虚拟现实手势介导模拟器进行微创外科基本心理运动技能培训和学习:开发和内容效度研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 14;22(7):e17491. doi: 10.2196/17491.
4
A Pilot Study on Oocyte Retrieval Simulator: A New Tool for Training?取卵模拟器的初步研究:一种新的培训工具?
J Med Syst. 2019 May 25;43(7):202. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1340-3.
5
Development and validation of 3D printed virtual models for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy: urologists' and patients' perception.3D 打印虚拟模型在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和部分肾切除术的开发和验证:泌尿科医生和患者的感知。
World J Urol. 2018 Feb;36(2):201-207. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2126-1. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
6
Face and content validity of the virtual reality simulator 'ScanTrainer®'.虚拟现实模拟器“ScanTrainer®”的表面效度和内容效度
Gynecol Surg. 2017;14(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s10397-017-1020-6. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
7
Face validity of the pulsatile organ perfusion trainer for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的搏动性器官灌注训练器的表面效度。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):714-722. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5025-4. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
8
How valid are commercially available medical simulators?市面上的医学模拟器有多有效?
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014 Oct 14;5:385-95. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S63435. eCollection 2014.
9
A review of the role of simulation in developing and assessing orthopaedic surgical skills.模拟在骨科手术技能培养与评估中的作用综述。
Iowa Orthop J. 2014;34:181-9.
10
Development and validation of an artificial wetlab training system for the lumbar discectomy.腰椎间盘切除术人工湿实验室训练系统的开发与验证
Eur Spine J. 2014 Sep;23(9):1978-83. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3257-3. Epub 2014 Mar 5.