Wilson B, Thornton J G, Hewison J, Lilford R J, Watt I, Braunholtz D, Robinson M
Centre for Reproduction Growth and Development, Leeds University, UK.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Jun;14(3):175-81. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.intqhc.a002609.
To measure levels of and changes in compliance with evidence-based recommendations in obstetrics in the UK. To identify barriers to and factors associated with compliance.
A quantitative case-note audit for 1988 and 1996, and a qualitative interview study of key staff.
Twenty maternity units, selected at random from all UK units
Fifty consecutive cases of pre-term delivery (PTD), Caesarean section (CS), instrumental delivery (ID), and perineal repair (PR) operations in each period in each unit. The lead clinician, midwifery manager, a senior midwife, neonatologist, and middle-grade obstetrician in each unit.
Maternal steroid use in PTD, antibiotic use in CS, use of the ventouse (vacuum extractor) rather than forceps as instrument of first choice for ID, and use of polyglycolic acid (PGA) sutures for PR in each time period. Facilities for implementing, staff attitudes to, and the degree of planning to follow each recommendation.
The median proportion of ventouse as instrument of first choice in each unit was 8% (range 0-32%) in 1988, rising to 64% (range 0-98%) in 1996. PGA use for PR was 0% (range 0-30%) in 1988, and 72% (range 0-100%) in 1996. Steroid use for eligible PTD was median 0% (range 0-23%) in 1988, rising to 82% (range 63-95%) in 1996. Antibiotic use for CS was 7% (range 0-25%) rising to 84% (range 10-100%) in 1996. There was no relationship between unit size, type of unit, facilities, staff attitudes or degree of planning, and compliance with the recommendations, nor was the level of adherence to one standard typically correlated with adherence to the others. However, there was a positive correlation (R = 0.6, P < 0.005) between local availability of the Cochrane database of perinatal trials and unit compliance with the audit standards in the latter time period.
We have documented a massive shift in practice in line with the evidence, although many units still have substantial room for improvement. About 2000 wound infections, 200 deaths due to prematurity, nearly 8000 women in pain from catgut sutures, and 1500 cases of severe perineal trauma from forceps remain preventable. The reasons why units vary remain obscure, although the qualitative interviews often revealed local factors such as key enthusiastic staff. There was no sign of evidence being positively driven into practice by any systematic managerial process. The relationship between Cochrane availability and high-standard care may be simply a marker of commitment to the evidence, but it remains plausible that if senior staff make Cochrane available for their juniors, audit compliance improves.
测量英国产科领域循证建议的依从水平及变化情况。识别依从性的障碍因素及相关因素。
1988年和1996年进行定量病例记录审核,并对关键工作人员开展定性访谈研究。
从英国所有产科单位中随机选取20个产科单位
每个单位在每个时期连续选取50例早产(PTD)、剖宫产(CS)、器械助产(ID)和会阴修补(PR)手术病例。每个单位的主诊医生、助产士长、资深助产士、新生儿科医生和中级产科医生。
每个时间段内,PTD中产妇使用类固醇、CS中使用抗生素、ID中首选胎头吸引器(真空吸引器)而非产钳、PR中使用聚乙醇酸(PGA)缝线的情况。实施相关建议的设施、工作人员的态度以及遵循每项建议的规划程度。
1988年,每个单位首选胎头吸引器的中位数比例为8%(范围0 - 32%),1996年升至64%(范围0 - 98%)。1988年PR使用PGA的比例为0%(范围0 - 30%),1996年为72%(范围0 - 100%)。1988年符合条件的PTD使用类固醇的中位数为0%(范围0 - 23%),1996年升至82%(范围63 - 95%)。1996年CS使用抗生素的比例从7%(范围0 - 25%)升至84%(范围10 - 100%)。单位规模、单位类型、设施、工作人员态度或规划程度与遵循建议之间没有关联,而且对一项标准的遵循程度通常与对其他标准的遵循程度也不相关。然而,在后期,围产期试验Cochrane数据库的本地可获取性与单位遵循审核标准之间存在正相关(R = 0.6,P < 0.005)。
我们记录到实践中已发生了与证据相符的巨大转变,尽管许多单位仍有很大的改进空间。约2000例伤口感染、200例早产死亡、近8000名因肠线缝合而疼痛的女性以及1500例因产钳导致的严重会阴创伤仍可预防。尽管定性访谈常常揭示出一些本地因素,如关键的热情工作人员,但各单位存在差异的原因仍不明确。没有迹象表明证据是通过任何系统的管理流程被积极地应用于实践中。Cochrane数据库的可获取性与高标准护理之间的关系可能仅仅是对证据的一种承诺标志,但如果高级工作人员为其下属提供Cochrane数据库,审核合规性得到改善似乎也是合理的。