Suppr超能文献

互联网上的人格研究:基于网络的工具与传统工具在家庭作业和课堂环境中的比较。

Personality research on the Internet: a comparison of Web-based and traditional instruments in take-home and in-class settings.

作者信息

Cronk Brian C, West Jamie L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Missouri Western State College, Saint Joseph, MO 64507, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 May;34(2):177-80. doi: 10.3758/bf03195440.

Abstract

Students, faculty, and researchers have become increasingly comfortable with the Internet, and many of them are interested in using the Web to collect data. Few published studies have investigated the differences between Web-based data and data collected with more traditional methods. In order to investigate these potential differences, two important factors were crossed in this study: whether the data were collected on line or not and whether the data were collected in a group setting at a fixed time or individually at a time of the respondent's choosing. The Visions of Morality scale (Shelton & McAdams, 1990) was used, and the participants were assigned to one of four conditions: in-class Web survey, in-class paper-and-pencil survey; take-home Web survey, and take-home paper-and-pencil survey. No significant differences in scores were found for any condition; however, response rates were affected by the type of survey administered, with the take-home Web-based instrument having the lowest response rate. Therefore, researchers need to be aware that different modes of administration may affect subject attrition and may, therefore, confound investigations of other independent variables.

摘要

学生、教师和研究人员对互联网越来越熟悉,他们中的许多人都有兴趣利用网络收集数据。很少有已发表的研究探讨基于网络的数据与用更传统方法收集的数据之间的差异。为了研究这些潜在差异,本研究将两个重要因素进行了交叉:数据是否在线收集以及数据是在固定时间的小组环境中收集还是在受访者选择的时间单独收集。使用了道德观量表(谢尔顿和麦克亚当斯,1990年),参与者被分配到四种情况之一:课堂网络调查、课堂纸笔调查;带回家的网络调查和带回家的纸笔调查。在任何情况下都未发现分数有显著差异;然而,回复率受所实施调查类型的影响,带回家的基于网络的工具回复率最低。因此,研究人员需要意识到不同的管理方式可能会影响受试者的流失率,从而可能混淆对其他自变量的调查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验