Decordier Ilse, Dillen Lubina, Cundari Enrico, Kirsch-Volders Micheline
Laboratory for Cell Genetics, Free University of Brussels, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Mutagenesis. 2002 Jul;17(4):337-44. doi: 10.1093/mutage/17.4.337.
Two major mechanisms responsible for chromosome segregation errors are non-disjunction and chromosome loss, both leading to aneuploidy. Previous studies in our laboratory showed the existence of thresholds for the induction of chromosome non-disjunction and chromosome loss and the induction of apoptosis by microtubule inhibitors. From a mechanistic point of view one can expect that apoptosis contributes to the elimination of cells with premutagenic/mutagenic lesions. If aneuploid cells were eliminated by the induction of apoptosis below the threshold concentrations for chromosome loss and non-disjunction, the defined thresholds would not be applicable to cells unable to undergo apoptosis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether apoptosis was induced directly or indirectly as a response to aberrant chromosome segregation below the thresholds for the induction of chromosome loss and non-disjunction, as previously defined by us. Therefore, human lymphocytes were exposed in vitro to five concentrations of nocodazole and five concentrations of carbendazim representing the threshold concentrations for chromosome non-disjunction and chromosome loss, two concentrations below the lowest threshold and one concentration between the two threshold values. After 48 h exposure to the aneugens, induction of apoptosis was analysed by the annexin-V test. The frequencies of chromosome non-disjunction and chromosome loss were estimated in cytokinesis-blocked human lymphocytes in combination with FISH; this methodology was applied to whole cell cultures as well as to apoptotic and viable cell fractions obtained using magnetic annexin microbead cell sorting. Our results suggest that elimination of aneuploid cells does occur. However, the efficiency of disappearance of micronucleated cells is higher than for cells presenting chromosome non-disjunction. The correlation found between early apoptotic events and micronucleus formation could account, at least in part, for the specific elimination of aneuploid cells.
导致染色体分离错误的两个主要机制是不分离和染色体丢失,二者都会导致非整倍体。我们实验室之前的研究表明,存在诱导染色体不分离、染色体丢失以及微管抑制剂诱导细胞凋亡的阈值。从机制角度来看,可以预期细胞凋亡有助于清除具有诱变前/诱变损伤的细胞。如果在低于染色体丢失和不分离阈值浓度的情况下通过诱导细胞凋亡来清除非整倍体细胞,那么所定义的阈值将不适用于无法发生细胞凋亡的细胞。本研究的目的是调查细胞凋亡是否如我们之前所定义的那样,作为对低于染色体丢失和不分离诱导阈值的异常染色体分离的直接或间接反应而被诱导。因此,将人淋巴细胞体外暴露于代表染色体不分离和染色体丢失阈值浓度的五种秋水仙素浓度以及五种多菌灵浓度、低于最低阈值的两种浓度和介于两个阈值之间的一种浓度。在暴露于非整倍体诱导剂48小时后,通过膜联蛋白-V试验分析细胞凋亡的诱导情况。结合荧光原位杂交(FISH)估计胞质分裂阻滞的人淋巴细胞中的染色体不分离和染色体丢失频率;该方法应用于全细胞培养物以及使用磁性膜联蛋白微珠细胞分选获得的凋亡和活细胞组分。我们的结果表明非整倍体细胞的清除确实会发生。然而,微核细胞消失的效率高于出现染色体不分离的细胞。早期凋亡事件与微核形成之间的相关性至少可以部分解释非整倍体细胞的特异性清除。