Endoscopic transthoracic sympathicotomy and peripheral microcirculation: effects of electric sympathetic chain stimulation, thermocoagulation and anaesthetic agents.

BACKGROUND

During endoscopic transthoracic sympathicotomy (ETS) in patients with hyperhidrosis it is useful to assess the effect of surgery peroperatively. However, the autonomic system is affected in various ways by different anesthetic agents. In the present study, the effect of ETS during either isoflurane or propofol anesthesia was evaluated by measuring changes in the finger pulp microcirculation using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). Electric stimulation of the sympathetic chain was used for identifying the sympathetic chain and to explore whether the anesthetic agents differentially influenced the LDF response to stimulation.

METHODS

From a group of 12 patients with incapacitating palmar hyperhidrosis, six were randomly assigned to isoflurane and six to propofol anesthesia. LDF probes were attached to the ipsilateral finger pulp for continuous recording of peripheral blood flow during the ETS procedure. Electric stimulation (1 Hz, 10 Hz, and 100 Hz) was applied to the sympathetic paravertebral chain at the levels of the 2nd and 3rd sympathetic ganglia via a custom designed bipolar electrode. In eight of the patients LDF recordings were also performed in the awake state and compared with records obtained from eight healthy subjects.

FINDINGS

In patients anesthetized with isoflurane, the base line finger pulp blood flow did not significantly differ from that of awake normal subjects, while those anesthetized with propofol had a lower base line flow, similar to that of awake subjects with hyperhidrosis. Stimulation of the sympathetic chain induced marked reduction of finger pulp microcirculation in both anesthetic groups, and this effect was frequency dependent during isoflurane anesthesia. After ETS a significant increase in flow was recorded only in the propofol group. Interpretation. The study demonstrates that the completeness of the sympathicotomy can only be peroperatively evaluated if an anesthetic agent with relatively low vasodilatory capacity, as e.g. propofol, is utilized.