Suppr超能文献

中度哮喘患者在吸入糖皮质激素基础上加用第二种控制药物的比较。

Comparison of second controller medications in addition to inhaled corticosteroid in patients with moderate asthma.

作者信息

Yurdakul A S, Calişir H C, Tunçtan B, Ogretensoy M

机构信息

Atatürk Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery Center, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2002 May;96(5):322-9. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2002.1282.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the second controller medications (long-acting beta2-agonist, leukotriene receptor antagonist and sustained-release theophylline) used in addition to inhaler corticosteroid treatment in moderate persistent asthma. A total of 64 patients with asthma, in the moderate persistent asthma category, were divided into three groups. Patients, all of whom were concurrently using inhaled corticosteroid (Budesonide 400 microg twice daily), were treated for 3 months with either inhaled formoterol 9 microg twice daily (first group), oral zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily (second group), or sustained-release theophylline 400 mg once daily (third group). All of the patients were subjected to assessments on the subject of peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), asthma symptom scores (daytime and night-time), supplemental terbutalin use, asthma exacerbations and adverse events. Over the 3-month treatment period. In all of the three groups, significant improvements were recorded in the lung function, asthma symptom scores and supplemental terbutalin use criteria, as a result oftreatments applied. Formoterol treatment resulted in significantly greater and earlier improvements compared with the other two groups in several criteria: PEF variability (17.9 +/- 2.5; 21.9 +/- 3.2; 23.7 +/- 3.3; P < 0.001); asthma symptom score (daytime) (1.6 +/- 0.5; 1 +/- 0.5; 2.0 +/- 0,5; P < 0.05); asthma symptom score (night-time) (1.2 +/- 0.4; 2.2 +/- 0.5; 16 +/- 0.6; P < 0001); and supplement alter butalin use (1.2 +/- 0.3; 1.8 +/- 0.5; 1.7 +/- 0.5; P < 0.05). However, at the end of the treatment, in all of the three groups studied, improvements were attained in overall asthma control and there was no statistical difference among the groups. Although there were no side effects which required the discontinuation of the treatment, it was observed that the maximum side effect was in the second group (20%, 31.6% and 20%, respectively). In conclusion, in patients who still have symptoms on treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, the addition of a long-acting beta2-agonist, leukotriene antagonists or sustained-release theophylline to the treatment is a logical approach, and, in addition to inhaled corticosteroids, any one of these second controller medications may be chosen in patients with moderate asthma.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较在中度持续性哮喘患者中,除吸入性糖皮质激素治疗外,加用第二代控制药物(长效β2受体激动剂、白三烯受体拮抗剂和缓释茶碱)的疗效和安全性。共有64例中度持续性哮喘患者被分为三组。所有患者均同时使用吸入性糖皮质激素(布地奈德400微克,每日两次),分别接受以下治疗3个月:第一组为吸入福莫特罗9微克,每日两次;第二组为口服扎鲁司特20毫克,每日两次;第三组为缓释茶碱400毫克,每日一次。所有患者均接受了关于呼气峰值流速(PEF)变异性、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、哮喘症状评分(日间和夜间)、特布他林补充使用情况、哮喘急性发作及不良事件等方面的评估。在3个月的治疗期内。由于进行了相应治疗,所有三组患者在肺功能、哮喘症状评分及特布他林补充使用标准方面均有显著改善。在几个标准方面,与其他两组相比,福莫特罗治疗带来的改善更为显著且更早:PEF变异性(分别为17.9±2.5;21.9±3.2;23.7±3.3;P<0.001);哮喘症状评分(日间)(分别为1.6±0.5;1±0.5;2.0±0.5;P<0.05);哮喘症状评分(夜间)(分别为1.2±0.4;2.2±0.5;1.6±0.6;P<0.001);以及特布他林补充使用情况(分别为1.2±0.3;1.8±0.5;1.7±0.5;P<0.05)。然而,在治疗结束时,所有三组研究对象的总体哮喘控制情况均有改善,且组间无统计学差异。虽然没有出现需要停药的副作用,但观察到最大副作用出现在第二组(分别为20%、31.6%和20%)。总之,对于在吸入性糖皮质激素治疗下仍有症状的患者,在治疗中加用长效β2受体激动剂、白三烯拮抗剂或缓释茶碱是一种合理的方法,并且,对于中度哮喘患者,除吸入性糖皮质激素外,可选择这些第二代控制药物中的任何一种。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验