Restuccia Domenico, Valeriani Massimiliano, Insola Angelo, Lo Monaco Mauro, Grassi Eugenio, Barba Carmen, Le Pera Domenica, Mauguière François
Department of Neurology, Catholic University, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Muscle Nerve. 2002 Jul;26(1):44-54. doi: 10.1002/mus.10163.
To elucidate whether the selective electrical stimulation of muscle as well as cutaneous afferents evokes modality-specific responses in somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) recorded on the scalp of humans, we compared scalp SEPs to electrical stimuli applied to the median nerve and to the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) motor point. In three subjects, we also recorded SEPs after stimulation of the distal phalanx of the thumb, which selectively involved cutaneous afferents. Motor point and median nerve SEPs showed the same scalp distribution; moreover, very similar dipole models, showing the same dipolar time courses, explained well the SEPs after both types of stimulation. Since the non-natural stimulation of muscle afferents evokes responses also in areas specifically devoted to cutaneous input processing, it is conceivable that, in physiological conditions, muscle afferents are differentially gated in somatosensory cortex. The frontocentral N30 response was absent after purely cutaneous stimulation; by contrast, it was relatively more represented in motor point rather than in mixed nerve SEPs. These data suggest that the N30 response is specifically evoked by proprioceptive inputs.
为了阐明对肌肉以及皮肤传入神经的选择性电刺激是否会在人类头皮记录的体感诱发电位(SEP)中引发特定模态的反应,我们将头皮SEP与施加于正中神经和拇短展肌(APB)运动点的电刺激进行了比较。在三名受试者中,我们还记录了刺激拇指远端指骨后(该刺激选择性地涉及皮肤传入神经)的SEP。运动点和正中神经SEP显示出相同的头皮分布;此外,非常相似的偶极子模型(显示相同的偶极时间进程)很好地解释了两种刺激后的SEP。由于对肌肉传入神经的非自然刺激也会在专门用于皮肤输入处理的区域引发反应,因此可以想象,在生理条件下,肌肉传入神经在体感皮层中受到不同的门控。纯皮肤刺激后额中央N30反应缺失;相比之下,它在运动点SEP中比在混合神经SEP中相对更明显。这些数据表明,N30反应是由本体感觉输入特异性引发的。