Hudson Melissa M, Tyc V L, Srivastava D K, Gattuso J, Quargnenti A, Crom D B, Hinds P
Department of Hematology-Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, and the Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee, Memphis, College of Medicine, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, USA.
Med Pediatr Oncol. 2002 Jul;39(1):2-1; discussion 2. doi: 10.1002/mpo.10071.
BACKGROUND: Improved cure rates for childhood cancer have produced a growing population of survivors at risk for late toxicities of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Healthy behaviors can modify these risks. We initiated a controlled prospective trial to determine if a multi-component behavioral intervention could induce change in childhood cancer survivors' health knowledge, health perceptions, and practice of health-protective behaviors. PROCEDURE: Adolescent cancer survivors attending a long-term follow-up clinic were randomized to receive standard follow-up care or standard care plus the educational intervention. Baseline measures were obtained at randomization (T(0)) and repeated 1 year (T(1)) later during the survivors' annual check-up. RESULTS: Of 272 patients enrolled and randomized, 251 are evaluable at both time points. Treatment and control groups were similar in regards to diagnosis, gender, race, and age. The change in outcome measures over the year (T(1)-T(0)) was not significantly different between the two groups as assessed by a two-sample pooled t test. However, additional exploratory analyses indicated a significant gender difference in knowledge with female survivors in the intervention group having higher scores. In addition, patients who choose certain individual health goals, such as breast/testicular self-examination, showed improved practice of the health behavior. In addition, in a very exploratory analysis, a gender difference in response to the intervention was noted, with females exhibiting a greater improvement in knowledge scores than did males. CONCLUSIONS: Although the multi-behavioral educational intervention did not induce change in health knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors of childhood cancer survivors for the treatment group as a whole, gender differences and specific health goal differences were found. These findings suggest that future interventions should be tailored to reflect gender differences and the nature of the health goal under assessment.
背景:儿童癌症治愈率的提高使得越来越多的幸存者面临化疗和放疗晚期毒性的风险。健康行为可以改变这些风险。我们开展了一项对照前瞻性试验,以确定多成分行为干预是否能促使儿童癌症幸存者的健康知识、健康认知以及健康保护行为发生改变。 程序:在长期随访诊所就诊的青少年癌症幸存者被随机分为两组,一组接受标准随访护理,另一组接受标准护理加教育干预。在随机分组时(T(0))获取基线测量数据,并在幸存者年度体检时于1年后(T(1))重复测量。 结果:在272名登记并随机分组的患者中,251名在两个时间点均可评估。治疗组和对照组在诊断、性别、种族和年龄方面相似。通过两样本合并t检验评估,两组在这一年(T(1)-T(0))的结果测量变化无显著差异。然而,额外的探索性分析表明,在知识方面存在显著的性别差异,干预组的女性幸存者得分更高。此外,选择某些个人健康目标(如乳房/睾丸自我检查)的患者,其健康行为的实践有所改善。另外,在一项非常探索性的分析中,注意到对干预的反应存在性别差异,女性在知识得分上的改善比男性更大。 结论:尽管多行为教育干预并未使整个治疗组的儿童癌症幸存者的健康知识、认知和行为发生改变,但发现了性别差异和特定健康目标差异。这些发现表明,未来的干预措施应进行调整,以反映性别差异和所评估健康目标的性质。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005-8
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2006-1-1
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007-2
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006-2
Cancer Med. 2023-9
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022-3-2