Wagner P J, Sidor C A
Department of Geology, Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605, USA.
Syst Biol. 2000 Sep;49(3):463-79. doi: 10.1080/10635159950127349.
Paleontologists frequently contrast clade rank (i.e., nodal or patristic distance from the base of a cladogram) with age rank (i.e., relative first known appearances of the analyzed taxa) to measure the degree of congruence between the estimated phylogeny and the fossil record. Although some potential biases of these methods have been examined (e.g., the effect of tree imbalance), other properties of age rank/clade rank (ARCR) comparisons have not been studied in detail. A basic premise of ARCR metrics is that outgroup taxa diverged earlier than ingroups and thus should first appear in older strata. For example, given phylogeny (A,(B,C)), then taxon A should be sampled before either taxon B or taxon C. We examine this premise in the context of (1) phylogenetic theory, (2) taxonomic practice, (3) sampling intensity (R), and (4) factors other than sampling intensity (including cladogram accuracy). Simulations combining clade evolution and sampling over time indicate a poor relationship between ARCR metrics and R when all taxa are apomorphy-based monophyletic groups. However, a good relationship exists when taxa are either stem-based monophyletic groups or if workers include taxa without a priori decisions about monophyly or paraphyly. These results are not surprising because cladograms predict the order in which lineages diverged (which applies to stem-based monophyletic taxa) and the order in which morphologic grades appeared (which applies to paraphyletic taxa relative to derived monophyletic groups). Other factors that increase ARCR metrics when the average R stays the same include high temporal variation in R, budding instead of bifurcating speciation patterns, low extinction rates, cladogram inaccuracy, and (to a much lesser extent) large clade size. These results suggest several plausible explanations for patterned differences in ARCR metrics among clades, thereby compromising their validity as measures of the quality of the fossil record.
古生物学家经常将分支等级(即从分支图基部起的节点或祖先距离)与年龄等级(即被分析类群的相对首次已知出现时间)进行对比,以衡量估计的系统发育与化石记录之间的一致程度。尽管已经研究了这些方法的一些潜在偏差(例如树形不平衡的影响),但年龄等级/分支等级(ARCR)比较的其他特性尚未得到详细研究。ARCR指标的一个基本前提是,外类群分类单元比内类群分化得更早,因此应该首先出现在更古老的地层中。例如,对于系统发育关系(A,(B,C)),那么分类单元A应该在分类单元B或分类单元C之前被采样。我们在(1)系统发育理论、(2)分类实践、(3)采样强度(R)以及(4)采样强度以外的因素(包括分支图准确性)的背景下检验了这一前提。随着时间推移结合分支进化和采样的模拟表明,当所有分类单元都是基于衍征的单系类群时,ARCR指标与R之间的关系较差。然而,当分类单元是基于祖先的单系类群时,或者如果研究者纳入了在单系性或并系性方面没有先验决定的分类单元时,就会存在良好的关系。这些结果并不令人惊讶,因为分支图预测了谱系分化的顺序(这适用于基于祖先的单系分类单元)以及形态等级出现的顺序(这适用于相对于衍生单系类群的并系分类单元)。当平均R保持不变时,增加ARCR指标的其他因素包括R的高时间变化、出芽而非二叉分支的物种形成模式、低灭绝率、分支图不准确以及(在小得多的程度上)大的分支规模。这些结果为各分支之间ARCR指标的模式差异提出了几种合理的解释,从而损害了它们作为衡量化石记录质量指标的有效性。