• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量树木、高级分类群和时间尺度上的地层一致性。

Measuring Stratigraphic Congruence Across Trees, Higher Taxa, and Time.

作者信息

O'Connor Anne, Wills Matthew A

机构信息

Milner Centre for Evolution, The University of Bath, The Avenue, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.

Milner Centre for Evolution, The University of Bath, The Avenue, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK

出版信息

Syst Biol. 2016 Sep;65(5):792-811. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw039. Epub 2016 May 6.

DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syw039
PMID:27155010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4997008/
Abstract

The congruence between the order of cladistic branching and the first appearance dates of fossil lineages can be quantified using a variety of indices. Good matching is a prerequisite for the accurate time calibration of trees, while the distribution of congruence indices across large samples of cladograms has underpinned claims about temporal and taxonomic patterns of completeness in the fossil record. The most widely used stratigraphic congruence indices are the stratigraphic consistency index (SCI), the modified Manhattan stratigraphic measure (MSM*), and the gap excess ratio (GER) (plus its derivatives; the topological GER and the modified GER). Many factors are believed to variously bias these indices, with several empirical and simulation studies addressing some subset of the putative interactions. This study combines both approaches to quantify the effects (on all five indices) of eight variables reasoned to constrain the distribution of possible values (the number of taxa, tree balance, tree resolution, range of first occurrence (FO) dates, center of gravity of FO dates, the variability of FO dates, percentage of extant taxa, and percentage of taxa with no fossil record). Our empirical data set comprised 647 published animal and plant cladograms spanning the entire Phanerozoic, and for these data we also modeled the effects of mean age of FOs (as a proxy for clade age), the taxonomic rank of the clade, and the higher taxonomic group to which it belonged. The center of gravity of FO dates had not been investigated hitherto, and this was found to correlate most strongly with some measures of stratigraphic congruence in our empirical study (top-heavy clades had better congruence). The modified GER was the index least susceptible to bias. We found significant differences across higher taxa for all indices; arthropods had lower congruence and tetrapods higher congruence. Stratigraphic congruence-however measured-also varied throughout the Phanerozoic, reflecting the taxonomic composition of our sample. Notably, periods containing a high proportion of arthropods had poorer congruence overall than those with higher proportions of tetrapods. [Fossil calibration; gap excess ratio; manhattan stratigraphic metric; molecular clocks; stratigraphic congruence.].

摘要

支序分支顺序与化石谱系首次出现日期之间的一致性可以通过多种指标进行量化。良好的匹配是对系统发育树进行准确时间校准的前提条件,而一致性指标在大量系统发育图样本中的分布则为有关化石记录中时间和分类学完整性模式的论断提供了支撑。使用最广泛的地层一致性指标有地层一致性指数(SCI)、修正的曼哈顿地层度量(MSM*)和间隙过量比(GER)(及其衍生指标;拓扑GER和修正GER)。人们认为有多种因素会以不同方式影响这些指标,已有多项实证研究和模拟研究探讨了一些假定相互作用的子集。本研究结合了这两种方法,以量化八个变量(推断会限制可能值分布的变量)对所有五个指标的影响(这八个变量分别是分类单元数量、树的平衡性、树的分辨率、首次出现(FO)日期范围、FO日期的重心、FO日期的变异性、现存分类单元的百分比以及无化石记录的分类单元的百分比)。我们的实证数据集包含647篇已发表的涵盖整个显生宙的动植物系统发育图,对于这些数据,我们还模拟了FO平均年龄(作为分支年龄的代理)、分支的分类等级以及其所属的高级分类群的影响。FO日期的重心此前尚未被研究过,而在我们的实证研究中发现它与某些地层一致性度量的相关性最强(基部较重的分支具有更好的一致性)。修正GER是最不易受偏差影响的指标。我们发现所有指标在高级分类群之间存在显著差异;节肢动物的一致性较低,而四足动物的一致性较高。地层一致性——无论如何度量——在整个显生宙也有所变化,这反映了我们样本的分类组成。值得注意的是,节肢动物比例高的时期总体一致性比四足动物比例高的时期要差。[化石校准;间隙过量比;曼哈顿地层度量;分子钟;地层一致性。]

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/4997008/6b6bb133363e/syw039f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/4997008/5f95c6ddad7e/syw039f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/4997008/7cdbf26e52d2/syw039f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/4997008/f407c3c3283f/syw039f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/4997008/6b6bb133363e/syw039f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/4997008/5f95c6ddad7e/syw039f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/4997008/7cdbf26e52d2/syw039f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/4997008/f407c3c3283f/syw039f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8e/4997008/6b6bb133363e/syw039f7.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring Stratigraphic Congruence Across Trees, Higher Taxa, and Time.测量树木、高级分类群和时间尺度上的地层一致性。
Syst Biol. 2016 Sep;65(5):792-811. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw039. Epub 2016 May 6.
2
The modified gap excess ratio (GER*) and the stratigraphic congruence of dinosaur phylogenies.修正后的间隙过剩比率(GER*)与恐龙系统发育的地层一致性。
Syst Biol. 2008 Dec;57(6):891-904. doi: 10.1080/10635150802570809.
3
Methods for the quantitative comparison of molecular estimates of clade age and the fossil record.进化枝年龄的分子估计与化石记录的定量比较方法。
Syst Biol. 2015 Jan;64(1):25-41. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu068. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
4
Uncertainty in the age of fossils and the stratigraphic fit to phylogenies.化石年代的不确定性以及地层与系统发育的匹配度。
Syst Biol. 2006 Jun;55(3):512-21. doi: 10.1080/10635150600755446.
5
Molecular and morphological phylogenies of mammals: congruence with stratigraphic data.哺乳动物的分子与形态系统发育:与地层数据的一致性。
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998 Jun;9(3):398-407. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0492.
6
The Implications of Stratigraphic Compatibility for Character Integration among Fossil Taxa.地层兼容性对化石分类单元间特征整合的影响
Syst Biol. 2015 Sep;64(5):838-52. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syv040. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
7
Age rank/clade rank metrics--sampling, taxonomy, and the meaning of "stratigraphic consistency".年龄等级/分支等级指标——采样、分类学以及“地层一致性”的含义
Syst Biol. 2000 Sep;49(3):463-79. doi: 10.1080/10635159950127349.
8
Parsimony, not Bayesian analysis, recovers more stratigraphically congruent phylogenetic trees.简约法而非贝叶斯分析法更能重建出具有更多地层一致性的系统发育树。
Biol Lett. 2018 Jun;14(6). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0263.
9
Bayesian Tip-Dated Phylogenetics in Paleontology: Topological Effects and Stratigraphic Fit.古生物学中的贝叶斯日期推断系统发育学:拓扑效应与地层拟合。
Syst Biol. 2021 Feb 10;70(2):283-294. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syaa057.
10
Comments on the Manhattan Stratigraphic Measure.关于曼哈顿地层测量的评论。
Cladistics. 2001 Sep;17(3):285-289. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2001.tb00125.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrative Phylogenetics: Tools for Palaeontologists to Explore the Tree of Life.整合系统发育学:古生物学家探索生命之树的工具。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Aug 7;11(8):1185. doi: 10.3390/biology11081185.
2
Molecular phylogenies map to biogeography better than morphological ones.分子系统发育比形态学更能反映生物地理学。
Commun Biol. 2022 May 31;5(1):521. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03482-x.
3
Craniodental and Postcranial Characters of Non-Avian Dinosauria Often Imply Different Trees.非鸟恐龙的颅骨牙齿特征和颅后骨骼特征往往暗示着不同的系统发育树。

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the effects of phylogenetic uncertainty and consensus trees on stratigraphic consistency scores: a new program and a standardized method.探索系统发育不确定性和共识树对地层一致性分数的影响:一个新程序和一种标准化方法。
Cladistics. 2011 Feb;27(1):52-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00320.x.
2
AMNIOTE PHYLOGENY AND THE IMPORTANCE OF FOSSILS.羊膜动物系统发育与化石的重要性
Cladistics. 1988 Jun;4(2):105-209. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1988.tb00514.x.
3
THE RETENTION INDEX AND THE RESCALED CONSISTENCY INDEX.保留指数与重新标度的一致性指数。
Syst Biol. 2020 Jul 1;69(4):638-659. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syz077.
4
Parsimony, not Bayesian analysis, recovers more stratigraphically congruent phylogenetic trees.简约法而非贝叶斯分析法更能重建出具有更多地层一致性的系统发育树。
Biol Lett. 2018 Jun;14(6). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0263.
Cladistics. 1989 Dec;5(4):417-419. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1989.tb00573.x.
4
CONGRUENCE BETWEEN SUPERPOSITIONAL AND PHYLOGENETIC PATTERNS: COMPARING CLADISTIC PATTERNS WITH FOSSIL RECORDS.叠加模式与系统发育模式之间的一致性:将分支模式与化石记录进行比较
Cladistics. 1992 Dec;8(4):319-337. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1992.tb00074.x.
5
Comments on the Manhattan Stratigraphic Measure.关于曼哈顿地层测量的评论。
Cladistics. 2001 Sep;17(3):285-289. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2001.tb00125.x.
6
Forum. Stratigraphic Fit to Phylogenies: A Proposed Solution.论坛。地层与系统发育的契合:一种提议的解决方案。
Cladistics. 1998 Jun;14(2):201-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1998.tb00333.x.
7
Measures of stratigraphic fit to phylogeny and their sensitivity to tree size, tree shape, and scale.地层与系统发育的拟合度测量及其对树大小、树形和尺度的敏感性。
Cladistics. 2004 Feb;20(1):64-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.00002.x.
8
A formula for maximum possible steps in multistate characters: isolating matrix parameter effects on measures of evolutionary convergence.多状态性状中最大可能步骤数的公式:分离矩阵参数对进化趋同度量的影响。
Cladistics. 2010 Feb;26(1):98-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00270.x. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
9
PATTERNS IN TREE BALANCE AMONG CLADISTIC, PHENETIC, AND RANDOMLY GENERATED PHYLOGENETIC TREES.支序分类、表型分类及随机生成的系统发育树中树平衡的模式。
Evolution. 1992 Dec;46(6):1818-1826. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb01171.x.
10
DO PHYLOGENETIC METHODS PRODUCE TREES WITH BIASED SHAPES?系统发育方法会产生形状有偏差的树吗?
Evolution. 1996 Aug;50(4):1418-1424. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03915.x.